Though a "limited hangout", Tucker's five part series exposes the deception behind the event that changed our country to an audience bigger than ever before
As Dr. David Ray Griffin's close colleague for about 15 years, I am always impressed by Gore Vidal's 2009 interview about David's early major 9/11 book:
In that interview Mr. Vidal explained that all major wars and conflicts and crises are managed through the manipulation of public fear. And this was the case with 9/11 starting the "global war on terror".
Nothing has changed since 2001, or since Mr. Vidal spoke these words in 2009. We are manipulated with fears of disease (Covid-19), other countries (e.g., Russia and China), domestic political opponents, economic downturns... anything at all.
Until the public becomes master of its own psychological assessments of reality, nothing will change. This could happen on social media, and perhaps it is beginning to happen, because what used to be called "the fourth estate" no longer exists.
Isn't it interesting how your saint Dr. David Ray Griffin never talked about evidence that was presented to court in 2007?
After 24 years, will you be honest with yourself at this late stage of your life?
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Unbelievable, what audacity. Calling the proven 9/11 demolition science, accepted and written about by literally thousands of engineers, architects, chemists and physicists and some of the top demolition experts on Earth, including with sophisticated computer models.
And you have the arrogance to call them "Revisionist". Sorry, dude, it is you who is the "revisionist". You are sounding like a Neoliberal, accusing others of being exactly what you are, projection.
And admit that you are promoting the crackpot Directed Energy Weapons sci-fi fable.
To Smith FS ... gotta stand for Fucking Stoopid. The proof that more than 3 buildings were destroyed and by DEW is to search Holes and WTC 6. Six was immediately between WTC 1 and WTC7.
50% of its mass was scooped out from roof to basement with no fallen debris from WTC 1 filling the hole or residing of the remaining WTC6 roof OR the roof of the Verizon building next to WTC7 either.
This factual reality alone is that the official faerie tale and the approved alternative LIES from Gage Hulsey Carlson Weldon et al are treasonous LIES.
I attended a talk David Ray Griffin gave on his book, The New Pearl Harbor, on October 20, 2004. At the time, I absolutely despised Tucker Carlson, wearing that stupid little bow tie and strutting his bellicose and obnoxious manner. Carlson's unwillingness to be open to Griffin laying out what was so clearly obvious: that the government/media narrative was a bald-faced lie, was infuriating. In time, we change, and Tucker has changed. I've changed too, and I'm extremely grateful for his voice on this and other issues. We cannot sing victory until the reputations of monsters Brennan, Cheney, Rice, Tenet, Bush, Wolfowitz, and all the others are ripped to shreds. There is no forgiving these people for all the violence and suffering they wreaked upon humankind. These f*ckers knew exactly what they were doing.
I found this comment on substack somewhere and archived it. I wonder if Putin's intelligence is valid? Nearly everyone in the freedom movement is controlled opposition or a limited hangout unfortunately.
"A friend of mine who follows things of this nature very closely, mentioned to me that when Tucker went to Russia to interview, Putin, Putin interrupted his introduction to state: “didn’t you apply to the CIA three times?” Tucker was blindsided but as it was a live feed the comment aired.
I don’t take Tucker at face value. Rather I think of him as a “persona with a certain shtick.” Limited hangout? …wouldn’t surprise me"
I've only watched the first episode, and I totally agree it's a (very) limited hangout. Tucker could have interviewed some much more knowledgeable 9/11 critics (even me:-) to get a much deeper understanding of all the issues with the official story. But at this point that's a quibble, compared to my total appreciation for Tucker opening the Overton window so wide. I think Tucker's evolution as a national commentator has been a remarkable and admirable one. (Remember when he still had a show on Fox, and he shared a long interview with RFK, Jr. back when Bobby was still the most censored guy in media.) The Tide is indeed Turning, and thank you Tucker for hopping on, no matter how belatedly. And yes of course, I want to echo Jilli in thanking you Madhava as well for your tireless efforts in this struggle. I know I always get a little feeling of pride knowing you are my friend when you take up the fight again and again.
I don't have words to express how i feel after reading this. It does not take rocket science to know who benefitted from 9/11. And I know who made those stock trades. I've known this for 24 years because a person who was involved told me. When he said, 'boys from the government advised our firm." I thought he was just trying to make himself seem important. Not until i read David Griffin's New Pearl Harbor in 2004, where he mentions the activity on the stock market did i revisit the issue. And revisit it I did. For the next 6 years I was ruthless in my inquiry. I watched Turning the Tide, which was pretty thorough but nothing new to me. My devotion to this cause caused a tremendous rupture of relationships that were important to me. My pursuit of justice caused me to be ostracized from my family, considered insane, and my inheritance put into a trust. i'd argue, present my research, submitted to psychiatric analysis, fruitlessly. My father, an arch Republican, would always say, 'no way. if it was an inside job, Tucker Carlson would be all over it." A quarter of a century later he offers this limited hangout, still obscuring the fairly obvious truth. Just weeks ago he uncritically interviews the Navy seal who says he killed Bin Laden. Now my father has passed away. Through a medium I believe he reached out to me. Said he was glad to see me enjoying my life in another country, that America is too corrupt to ever be saved. The Buddha was right. This is a realm of pain, based on greed, hatred, and ignorance. Studying 9/11 can really help you see how true that is. So maybe I should be thankful. But I would sure like that money. I honor and support all pursuits of truth and justice. May you all succeed. "Let the truth be known, though the heavens may fall."
People will always ask, then what really happened?
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s what the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
You might also want to read the 2007 qui-tam whistle-blower case filed presenting the evidence collected.
This textbook that should be mandatory reading for everyone on earth.
A 500-page textbook, that the 9/11 “truther” movement DOES NOT want you to know about or read, because once you’ve read it and understand the evidence, their grift is up. The scariest 9/11 book out there: “Where did the towers go?” by Dr Judy Wood.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I watched. I also think it was a limited hangout. One note though: Having watched Kim Iversen's show for seven years or so, I can tell you that her openness to 911 conspiracy theories predates TC's more recent acceptance of foul play. It's funny to watch people admit that there was foul play but sidestep or never address the largest elephant in the room, i.e., the impossible physics of it it all--Building 7, etc.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
VERY well said, Madhava! I have been heartened to see Tucker Carlson's transformation over these last few years, proving that every now and then people CAN change for the better. I'll add that he also abused Professor Steven Jones when he refused to show WTC 7 being destroyed like a blue-ribbon controlled demolition.
Now Glenn Greenwald, whose analyses are very insightful but who has never, to my knowledge, reported anything about the 9/11 psyop, has interviewed Tucker regarding his series.
Yes, I am disappointed to hear that Tucker avoids the science showing controlled demolition, but it is a start to waking up folks who have insisted on remaining asleep to this very day.
As an anesthesiologist, is it your experience that some people need to wake up more slowly?
It's an interesting question, Fran. There are "stages" of anesthesia. Stage 2, which must be entered and exited as a person regains consciousness is marked by hyper reactivity and the emergence of reflexes that can be life threatening. Attempting to "wake" someone up quickly from stage 2 can be dangerous.
Prof David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
A discussion with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
The title of the conference we attended in DC speaks volumes. Yes the tide is truly turning where eventually a tsunami of truth will crash ashore and destroy the sandcastles of lies upon lies we’ve all been fed for decades and probably centuries. It’s been apparent to me that 9/11 revelations have more potential to wake up humanity than practically any other PsyOp just because of the shock factor they can and will induce. The deep state cabal who formulated and carried out these evil events knows well how such shock and awe tactics work on the collective psyche. With trusted influencers like Tucker and others leading the way, we might finally see a similar response, but this time in a direction towards peace, integrity and civility. And when this happens, there’ll be no turning back. From my POV it cannot happen any other way and the sooner the better.
One of the best ways to attempt to lead the opposition is to promote crackpot, fringe theories, like the DEW hypothesis. The CIA even has a name for it, they call it "poisoning the well".
Professor Hughes talks about three camps of truth awareness...
Camp 1 - The government narrative
Camp 2 - The government approved counter narrative, filled with truth tellers, that don't tell you the full truth, it's also filled with charlatans and operatives to muddle up the truth and most truth seekers get stuck in camp two.
Camp 3 - The uncomfortable truth, where the truth gets ridiculed, censored and the algorithms make sure you don't get to camp three easily.
Prof David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
A discussion with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
As I stated accurately a fringe theory, that everyone laughs at and virtually nobody takes seriously enough to waste their valuable time on sifting through the volumes of gibberish such diversionists publish. Most of them likely on the CIA payroll.
Just tell us how your DEW weapons take down buildings? No links, explain in your own words. What's the energy source? What's the beam wavelength? How does it turn steel and concrete into vapor? Show us a real demo.
If they had weapons even 1/1000th the power of that, Russia would be finished in Ukraine, they could knock down every drone, missile, helicopter, jet aircraft that they put in the sky.
Spoken just like someone who is yet to apply intellectual humility and critical thinking skills.
Like you, I once bought into what AE was selling for many years.
Then I dared do what they said one should not do.
Look at the evidence and not blindly believe the "trusted experts".
Did you learn nothing during cv-19? Or are you to scared to do the work and come to the realisation that all that money you gave AE over the years, has been funding the greater cover-up?
Or will you play the premeditated ignorance game for another 24 years?
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Thanks for this. I listened and appreciate your tone. Heart crushing. I will never forget the saddenss, and dispair I felt when I first realized the truth in 2003, that our own governemnt had killed it's own citizens to fulfill agenda of going to war in middle east. The truth will set you free, but first it will make you angry and break your heart. The arocities done subsequently, makes me wonder what people are capable of. I never, from there after, trust the government.
Tucker seems to be taking steps to a full understanding of the events. I’ll give him time to get there. Enlightenment doesn’t usually come in one swell foop.
So many of these outlets are "limited hangouts" ....and looking at the Kirk event , it all just leaves you reeling....which is the goal...knowing something is terribly wrong and not knowing what one can possibly do...
Camp 2 - The government approved counter narrative, filled with truth tellers, that don't tell you the full truth, it's also filled with charlatans and operatives to muddle up the truth and most truth seekers get stuck in camp two.
Camp 3 - The uncomfortable truth, where the truth gets ridiculed, censored and the algorithms make sure you don't get to camp three easily.
Prof David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
A discussion with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Going to get really uncomfortable some day if we will ever be going down camp one, camp two and camp three of the revisionist perspectives of the holocaust.
And AW1 & WW2 for that matter.
Amazing the amount of human capital/intellect squandered hiding the truth.
Really? How do you figure that? Massive oil & gas reserves, exploited by the likes of Exxon, BP, Shell, Chevron. US military bases all over the region. US & European companies raking in $trillions. The soft underbelly of arch-enemy Russia exposed. Patriot Act. Freedom Act. FISA warrantless spying on citizens. Severe air travel restrictions. No-fly edicts against citizens. A long, long list.
It's all in the Project for a New American Century. More accurately for a new Bankster led Century.
Not from or in the US (nor the west). Generally speaking, 9/11 was a shocking incident for people around the world. At the time, I doubt many would have believed any unconventional explanations. Now, I don’t know; it’s probably more likely they’d believe it. It did affect everyone though in terms of the inconvenience of increased airport security. But I’m dropping a comment just to say I really don’t get why people have to be so contentious. I arrived at your substack, like many other ones, through my interest in the medical freedom movement.
At first, I was pretty surprised you were talking about 9/11. It was hard to buy what you were saying, although that changed as time passed. My views don’t matter though. I’m writing to express how incredible I find it that people on this platform can be so contentious. Carlson is a journalist; he’s presenting information that he found both interesting and credible. You are like many in the medical freedom movement that have expanded to write about other subjects, I believe, because you see an ultimate connection. Yet people come into the comments writing in a very supercilious manner which, though they may have some valuable views, is very off-putting. They seem to want to persuade, but don’t do a very good job as far as I’m concerned. But they don’t stop, and it seems such a waste of energy which perhaps could be more productively employed. Probably I'll get a dose of that now!🙂
Only reason you find Tucker credible is because you have much to learn about what happened on 9/11.
I suggest you start with these two articles of mine and watch the documentary over the weekend.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
I didn't say Carlson was credible. But I did say I'm not from nor in the US, and I only follow this substack because of my interest in medical freedom. If this writer writes on other subjects, I'm interested in their views, but not in delving deeper. I'll leave that to others, especially Americans. But thank you anyway.
Great piece, once again Madhava. I so appreciate your laser focus and articulate and salient words. Hopefully Tucker’s series will leave a bread crumb trail to the more inclusive works of others on what is really the most atrocious crimes perpetrated against America and the world. Let’s find out who was behind all this and make it known to everyone!!!!
Thanks for your courageous work. I appreciated hearing Tucker‘s first episode, both for the large audience he reaches and also the detailed information about the CIA refusing to provide the FBI with information about foreign terrorists in the US.
Thank you so much for this summary, Madhava.
As Dr. David Ray Griffin's close colleague for about 15 years, I am always impressed by Gore Vidal's 2009 interview about David's early major 9/11 book:
https://youtu.be/TzHfKEFDAL8?si=dveWuTV1Ysac6Cms
In that interview Mr. Vidal explained that all major wars and conflicts and crises are managed through the manipulation of public fear. And this was the case with 9/11 starting the "global war on terror".
Nothing has changed since 2001, or since Mr. Vidal spoke these words in 2009. We are manipulated with fears of disease (Covid-19), other countries (e.g., Russia and China), domestic political opponents, economic downturns... anything at all.
Until the public becomes master of its own psychological assessments of reality, nothing will change. This could happen on social media, and perhaps it is beginning to happen, because what used to be called "the fourth estate" no longer exists.
Completely agree Elizabeth
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
Isn't it interesting how your saint Dr. David Ray Griffin never talked about evidence that was presented to court in 2007?
After 24 years, will you be honest with yourself at this late stage of your life?
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
A discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/psychology-of-resistance-to-truth
Ephesians 5:11 - Have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but expose them.
Galatians 4:16 - So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
It’s about time!! 🔥 Thank you for your tireless work in bringing the truth about 9/11 to light.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Unbelievable, what audacity. Calling the proven 9/11 demolition science, accepted and written about by literally thousands of engineers, architects, chemists and physicists and some of the top demolition experts on Earth, including with sophisticated computer models.
And you have the arrogance to call them "Revisionist". Sorry, dude, it is you who is the "revisionist". You are sounding like a Neoliberal, accusing others of being exactly what you are, projection.
And admit that you are promoting the crackpot Directed Energy Weapons sci-fi fable.
Are you offended because you've been brainwashed NOT to count past three?
Here is two more articles, that might get your brain matter working.
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
Yes, you tell us how this professor "can't count past three":
Professor of Structural Engineering, Leroy Hulsey:
Expert DEMOLISHES Establishment Story About WTC Bldg. 7 Collapse! The Jimmy Dore Show
https://rumble.com/v40kb91-expert-demolishes-establishment-story-about-wtc-bldg.-7-collapse.html
Do you know what important evidence he left out of the B7 study he was paid $316 000 from your donations?
Apply yourself and read about it.
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
To Smith FS ... gotta stand for Fucking Stoopid. The proof that more than 3 buildings were destroyed and by DEW is to search Holes and WTC 6. Six was immediately between WTC 1 and WTC7.
50% of its mass was scooped out from roof to basement with no fallen debris from WTC 1 filling the hole or residing of the remaining WTC6 roof OR the roof of the Verizon building next to WTC7 either.
This factual reality alone is that the official faerie tale and the approved alternative LIES from Gage Hulsey Carlson Weldon et al are treasonous LIES.
Okay ... FS could stand for feckless snake too.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
I attended a talk David Ray Griffin gave on his book, The New Pearl Harbor, on October 20, 2004. At the time, I absolutely despised Tucker Carlson, wearing that stupid little bow tie and strutting his bellicose and obnoxious manner. Carlson's unwillingness to be open to Griffin laying out what was so clearly obvious: that the government/media narrative was a bald-faced lie, was infuriating. In time, we change, and Tucker has changed. I've changed too, and I'm extremely grateful for his voice on this and other issues. We cannot sing victory until the reputations of monsters Brennan, Cheney, Rice, Tenet, Bush, Wolfowitz, and all the others are ripped to shreds. There is no forgiving these people for all the violence and suffering they wreaked upon humankind. These f*ckers knew exactly what they were doing.
I found this comment on substack somewhere and archived it. I wonder if Putin's intelligence is valid? Nearly everyone in the freedom movement is controlled opposition or a limited hangout unfortunately.
"A friend of mine who follows things of this nature very closely, mentioned to me that when Tucker went to Russia to interview, Putin, Putin interrupted his introduction to state: “didn’t you apply to the CIA three times?” Tucker was blindsided but as it was a live feed the comment aired.
I don’t take Tucker at face value. Rather I think of him as a “persona with a certain shtick.” Limited hangout? …wouldn’t surprise me"
I saw the interview and remember Putin's comment.
Thanks!👍❤
So it did occur! Putins KGB friends would have researched Carlson thoroughly prior to letting him do the interview.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
I've only watched the first episode, and I totally agree it's a (very) limited hangout. Tucker could have interviewed some much more knowledgeable 9/11 critics (even me:-) to get a much deeper understanding of all the issues with the official story. But at this point that's a quibble, compared to my total appreciation for Tucker opening the Overton window so wide. I think Tucker's evolution as a national commentator has been a remarkable and admirable one. (Remember when he still had a show on Fox, and he shared a long interview with RFK, Jr. back when Bobby was still the most censored guy in media.) The Tide is indeed Turning, and thank you Tucker for hopping on, no matter how belatedly. And yes of course, I want to echo Jilli in thanking you Madhava as well for your tireless efforts in this struggle. I know I always get a little feeling of pride knowing you are my friend when you take up the fight again and again.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
I don't have words to express how i feel after reading this. It does not take rocket science to know who benefitted from 9/11. And I know who made those stock trades. I've known this for 24 years because a person who was involved told me. When he said, 'boys from the government advised our firm." I thought he was just trying to make himself seem important. Not until i read David Griffin's New Pearl Harbor in 2004, where he mentions the activity on the stock market did i revisit the issue. And revisit it I did. For the next 6 years I was ruthless in my inquiry. I watched Turning the Tide, which was pretty thorough but nothing new to me. My devotion to this cause caused a tremendous rupture of relationships that were important to me. My pursuit of justice caused me to be ostracized from my family, considered insane, and my inheritance put into a trust. i'd argue, present my research, submitted to psychiatric analysis, fruitlessly. My father, an arch Republican, would always say, 'no way. if it was an inside job, Tucker Carlson would be all over it." A quarter of a century later he offers this limited hangout, still obscuring the fairly obvious truth. Just weeks ago he uncritically interviews the Navy seal who says he killed Bin Laden. Now my father has passed away. Through a medium I believe he reached out to me. Said he was glad to see me enjoying my life in another country, that America is too corrupt to ever be saved. The Buddha was right. This is a realm of pain, based on greed, hatred, and ignorance. Studying 9/11 can really help you see how true that is. So maybe I should be thankful. But I would sure like that money. I honor and support all pursuits of truth and justice. May you all succeed. "Let the truth be known, though the heavens may fall."
People will always ask, then what really happened?
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s what the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
You might also want to read the 2007 qui-tam whistle-blower case filed presenting the evidence collected.
Link: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
It was also nicely put together in this 500-page textbook.
Link: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/
This textbook that should be mandatory reading for everyone on earth.
A 500-page textbook, that the 9/11 “truther” movement DOES NOT want you to know about or read, because once you’ve read it and understand the evidence, their grift is up. The scariest 9/11 book out there: “Where did the towers go?” by Dr Judy Wood.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
I watched. I also think it was a limited hangout. One note though: Having watched Kim Iversen's show for seven years or so, I can tell you that her openness to 911 conspiracy theories predates TC's more recent acceptance of foul play. It's funny to watch people admit that there was foul play but sidestep or never address the largest elephant in the room, i.e., the impossible physics of it it all--Building 7, etc.
Give this article of mine a read through.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
The demonic nature of the US government is becoming painfully clear - and it is painful to witness.
VERY well said, Madhava! I have been heartened to see Tucker Carlson's transformation over these last few years, proving that every now and then people CAN change for the better. I'll add that he also abused Professor Steven Jones when he refused to show WTC 7 being destroyed like a blue-ribbon controlled demolition.
Now Glenn Greenwald, whose analyses are very insightful but who has never, to my knowledge, reported anything about the 9/11 psyop, has interviewed Tucker regarding his series.
Yes, I am disappointed to hear that Tucker avoids the science showing controlled demolition, but it is a start to waking up folks who have insisted on remaining asleep to this very day.
As an anesthesiologist, is it your experience that some people need to wake up more slowly?
It's an interesting question, Fran. There are "stages" of anesthesia. Stage 2, which must be entered and exited as a person regains consciousness is marked by hyper reactivity and the emergence of reflexes that can be life threatening. Attempting to "wake" someone up quickly from stage 2 can be dangerous.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
Hi Fran - Still waiting on that face to face discussion, as you are a free speech advocate.
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
A discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/psychology-of-resistance-to-truth
Prof David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
A discussion with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-hughes-on-the-importance-of
The title of the conference we attended in DC speaks volumes. Yes the tide is truly turning where eventually a tsunami of truth will crash ashore and destroy the sandcastles of lies upon lies we’ve all been fed for decades and probably centuries. It’s been apparent to me that 9/11 revelations have more potential to wake up humanity than practically any other PsyOp just because of the shock factor they can and will induce. The deep state cabal who formulated and carried out these evil events knows well how such shock and awe tactics work on the collective psyche. With trusted influencers like Tucker and others leading the way, we might finally see a similar response, but this time in a direction towards peace, integrity and civility. And when this happens, there’ll be no turning back. From my POV it cannot happen any other way and the sooner the better.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
One of the best ways to attempt to lead the opposition is to promote crackpot, fringe theories, like the DEW hypothesis. The CIA even has a name for it, they call it "poisoning the well".
Professor Hughes talks about three camps of truth awareness...
Camp 1 - The government narrative
Camp 2 - The government approved counter narrative, filled with truth tellers, that don't tell you the full truth, it's also filled with charlatans and operatives to muddle up the truth and most truth seekers get stuck in camp two.
Camp 3 - The uncomfortable truth, where the truth gets ridiculed, censored and the algorithms make sure you don't get to camp three easily.
Prof David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
A discussion with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-hughes-on-the-importance-of
9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline – Prof David A. Hughes
Given the massive amount of evidence calling the official "9/11" narrative into question, why won't academia ask any critical questions?
Read the peer reviewed paper here: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/911-truth-and-the-silence-of-the
As I stated accurately a fringe theory, that everyone laughs at and virtually nobody takes seriously enough to waste their valuable time on sifting through the volumes of gibberish such diversionists publish. Most of them likely on the CIA payroll.
Just tell us how your DEW weapons take down buildings? No links, explain in your own words. What's the energy source? What's the beam wavelength? How does it turn steel and concrete into vapor? Show us a real demo.
If they had weapons even 1/1000th the power of that, Russia would be finished in Ukraine, they could knock down every drone, missile, helicopter, jet aircraft that they put in the sky.
Spoken just like someone who is yet to apply intellectual humility and critical thinking skills.
Like you, I once bought into what AE was selling for many years.
Then I dared do what they said one should not do.
Look at the evidence and not blindly believe the "trusted experts".
Did you learn nothing during cv-19? Or are you to scared to do the work and come to the realisation that all that money you gave AE over the years, has been funding the greater cover-up?
Or will you play the premeditated ignorance game for another 24 years?
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Thanks for this. I listened and appreciate your tone. Heart crushing. I will never forget the saddenss, and dispair I felt when I first realized the truth in 2003, that our own governemnt had killed it's own citizens to fulfill agenda of going to war in middle east. The truth will set you free, but first it will make you angry and break your heart. The arocities done subsequently, makes me wonder what people are capable of. I never, from there after, trust the government.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
Tucker seems to be taking steps to a full understanding of the events. I’ll give him time to get there. Enlightenment doesn’t usually come in one swell foop.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
So many of these outlets are "limited hangouts" ....and looking at the Kirk event , it all just leaves you reeling....which is the goal...knowing something is terribly wrong and not knowing what one can possibly do...
The first step is to be able to admit to yourself you have been fooled.
I struggled with admitting it to myself.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
There are three camps of truth awareness;
Camp 1 - The government narrative
Camp 2 - The government approved counter narrative, filled with truth tellers, that don't tell you the full truth, it's also filled with charlatans and operatives to muddle up the truth and most truth seekers get stuck in camp two.
Camp 3 - The uncomfortable truth, where the truth gets ridiculed, censored and the algorithms make sure you don't get to camp three easily.
Prof David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
A discussion with 9/11 Revisionist
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-hughes-on-the-importance-of
Going to get really uncomfortable some day if we will ever be going down camp one, camp two and camp three of the revisionist perspectives of the holocaust.
And AW1 & WW2 for that matter.
Amazing the amount of human capital/intellect squandered hiding the truth.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng
Cui bono? Israel was the principal beneficiary from the 9/11 attacks.
Really? How do you figure that? Massive oil & gas reserves, exploited by the likes of Exxon, BP, Shell, Chevron. US military bases all over the region. US & European companies raking in $trillions. The soft underbelly of arch-enemy Russia exposed. Patriot Act. Freedom Act. FISA warrantless spying on citizens. Severe air travel restrictions. No-fly edicts against citizens. A long, long list.
It's all in the Project for a New American Century. More accurately for a new Bankster led Century.
I agree the American Neocons wanted all this. What Israel wanted was for USto go to war against Iraq, Syria etc.
Not from or in the US (nor the west). Generally speaking, 9/11 was a shocking incident for people around the world. At the time, I doubt many would have believed any unconventional explanations. Now, I don’t know; it’s probably more likely they’d believe it. It did affect everyone though in terms of the inconvenience of increased airport security. But I’m dropping a comment just to say I really don’t get why people have to be so contentious. I arrived at your substack, like many other ones, through my interest in the medical freedom movement.
At first, I was pretty surprised you were talking about 9/11. It was hard to buy what you were saying, although that changed as time passed. My views don’t matter though. I’m writing to express how incredible I find it that people on this platform can be so contentious. Carlson is a journalist; he’s presenting information that he found both interesting and credible. You are like many in the medical freedom movement that have expanded to write about other subjects, I believe, because you see an ultimate connection. Yet people come into the comments writing in a very supercilious manner which, though they may have some valuable views, is very off-putting. They seem to want to persuade, but don’t do a very good job as far as I’m concerned. But they don’t stop, and it seems such a waste of energy which perhaps could be more productively employed. Probably I'll get a dose of that now!🙂
Only reason you find Tucker credible is because you have much to learn about what happened on 9/11.
I suggest you start with these two articles of mine and watch the documentary over the weekend.
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
I didn't say Carlson was credible. But I did say I'm not from nor in the US, and I only follow this substack because of my interest in medical freedom. If this writer writes on other subjects, I'm interested in their views, but not in delving deeper. I'll leave that to others, especially Americans. But thank you anyway.
Then you know of Denis Rancourt?
What is his take on 9/11?
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v3ujhqh-911-and-thermite-busted.html
And Dr Mike Yeadon?
Dr Mike Yeadon getting stuck into 9/11 truth
The ex-Pfizer scientist is about to find the truth of the events on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-getting-stuck-into
Great piece, once again Madhava. I so appreciate your laser focus and articulate and salient words. Hopefully Tucker’s series will leave a bread crumb trail to the more inclusive works of others on what is really the most atrocious crimes perpetrated against America and the world. Let’s find out who was behind all this and make it known to everyone!!!!
Give my two articles a read through. Episode 3 article drops today.
The Tucker Carlson 9/11 Files | Ep 1
An Alternative Media Talking Head's Mission in uncovering 9/11 truth gone wrong
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-tucker-carlson-911-files-ep-1
The Tucker Carlson 9/11 Files | Ep 2
An Alternative Media Talking Head's Mission in Uncovering 9/11 Truth Gone Wrong
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-tucker-carlson-911-files-ep-2
Thanks for your courageous work. I appreciated hearing Tucker‘s first episode, both for the large audience he reaches and also the detailed information about the CIA refusing to provide the FBI with information about foreign terrorists in the US.
Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research
Article: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ending-the-nano-thermite-911-hypothesis
Let’s end the ‘Nano Thermite’ hypothesis so we can focus on real science.
Join my LIVESTREAM at 22:00 CET on Sunday 5th October 2025.
Link: https://youtu.be/oQ1QbI_hZng