I am once again impressed by the content and tone of the comments on this provocative piece. Thank you all for creating a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas. This is has always been my motivation for creating this substack.
Several readers have brought up the work of Dr. Judy Wood. I appreciate her efforts. I appreciate that she is able to separate fact from speculation. As someone who took 16 years to question the official explanation I am very impressed by the fact that she knew immediately that we were being lied to and that she did not hesitate to make her position known.
Could it have been a directed energy weapon? Absolutely. However, as I am sure she would acknowledge, it is impossible to know with certainty. I am not an expert in such technology. It would be irresponsible for me to opine on this. I am sad to see the truth movement become internally at odds over things we cannot know for sure.
My interest is to create curiosity about what we were told. This is a tall order because asking questions about this event immediately leads to very dark places. This is why my approach has been to separate what can be known from guesswork. This was the strategy I used four years ago: identify the impossibilities of the official explanation and then identify the improbabilities. It is our inability to distinguish the two that keeps us locked in our loyalty to the official narrative.
Many who discount the 9/11 truth movement use the sole argument that too many people would have been involved in such a cover up. It would be impossible for such a thing to be kept secret.
It is not impossible. It is only improbable. There is a world of difference between the two. 80 years ago tens of thousands of people were peripherally involved in the creation of the A-bomb. Very few knew what the big picture was. Truman was unaware of the Manhattan project until the day after FDR died.
This leads to the question, where are the whistleblowers? Surely someone would have come forward! It is not so hard to keep people quiet. There are carrots (several high ranking members of NIST involved in their pseudo investigation obtained large promotions). There are sticks (undoubtedly these same folks were threatened with retribution if they asked too many questions). But that is not the real leverage point. Whoever was responsible for this heinous event clearly controls the media. What would be the point in coming forward if you will be vilified? It is the media that determines whether a person is a whistleblower or a nut-job looking for publicity. The absence of whistleblowers does not prove there was no conspiracy.
Finally there is the question of planes. First it is vital to see that approaching someone who may be open to hearing an alternative explanation will shut down their inquiry if they hear that no planes hit the buildings. If you happen to believe there were no planes I suggest using a different approach.
Second, the movie "September Clues" offers "official" video that shows the nose cone of the second plane emerging intact on the other side of the building. This is clearly impossible. But how are we to verify that this is an authentic video of what was shown on TV? Could it be counterintelligence designed to drive the "no plane" hypothesis to confuse the public even more? I certainly don't know.
This brings up another very important point. Some people believe that aluminum planes could never slice through steel beams. This is untrue. Though the strength of steel and concrete is much greater than aluminum, it doesn't mean that a collision of sufficient energy couldn't destroy steel and concrete. This is easily demonstrated by the pictures we see of plane nose cones severely damaged by collisions with seagulls offered as proof that aluminum fuselage is no match for steel. "Look how fragile planes are!" Yes, they are fragile. But why did a bird do such damage to them? It is the energy of impact that determines what gets destroyed. A peanut hitting a steel plate with sufficient velocity will leave a dent.
The point here is that when a plane hits steel, the steel may be destroyed. But if the steel gets destroyed, the plane will be too. This is certain. This is important because there was very little left of the plane to damage the central columns, something necessary to destroy the twin towers.
So what, if anything, struck the twin towers? I don't know. I am quite confident that it wasn't two commercial airplanes flown by jihadists with single engine licenses on a suicide mission. Whoever orchestrated this tragedy would have never banked on the fact that they wouldn't lose their nerve or that they would assuredly hit their targets with pinpoint accuracy. The entire op would have failed if one of those things occurred.
I now speculate...
61 years ago the military hawks surrounding JFK suggested an operation that would make it seem like an American civil aircraft was shot down by Cuban MIG fighters in order to create a pretense for a military invasion of Cuba. The civilian aircraft would be boarded by operatives with aliases. Midflight, their transponder would shut off and be replaced by one transmitted from a drone craft painted to look the civilian plane. The craft with operatives aboard would land at Elgin AFB while the drone would be intentionally crashed. Thus it would be easy to create the story that the Cuban military took hostile action against American civilians.
This devious plan was called "Operation Northwoods". JFK wouldn't go along with it, but the similarities between this proposal and what might have happened on 9/11 are hard to miss.
How do we know this plan was suggested? Here is the link to the document obtained via a FOIA request (read page 10 of the annex):
Of course I have no idea if this was the strategy used. However, this document is proof of the pure psychopathy behind the war machine back then which is assuredly alive and well today.
So then, what happened to the people aboard the four planes that were hijacked? If they followed this plan, the pilots and flight attendants on these planes were "operatives". They landed the planes secretly on various airbases. The passengers were offered apologies for the inconvenience. They were told they were part of a very real military exercise involving simulated attacks from commercial jet planes and they would be on their way very soon.
Meanwhile some sort of military craft was remotely guided with pinpoint accuracy to each twin tower.
The passengers were instructed to call their loved ones to let them know that had been hijacked and that the culprits were of middle eastern descent. This would explain how these cellphone calls were completed in 2001. But why were they instructed to do this?
Answer: This would offer powerful eyewitness testimony that would be hard to contest. There was a hijacking. The perpetrators were jihadists. What happened to them next is up to you to decide...
Your “Welcome to the Club of No Return” moment was the same as mine: seeing WTC 7 collapsing for the first time (4 years after 9/11.)
It was stunningly obvious even to someone whose structural engineering experience was confined to collapsing sand castles on the beach.
Like you, my most profound surprise was the dismissive and/or hostile reactions of intelligent friends and family.
By the time the Plandemic was initiated I understood far more about the human mind’s need to “understand” (aka BE TOLD WHAT TO BELIEVE.) The designers of both events leveraged a human psychological glitch. They did it brilliantly.
"It was stunningly obvious even to someone whose structural engineering experience was confined to collapsing sand castles on the beach."
Love that!
I agree that it was done brilliantly. However it only worked because of the role of legacy media. If they did their job and ran the slo-mo video of the North tower coming down as often as they flashed bin Laden's face there is no way the public would have bought the story.
We may never discover who was behind this. We can be certain that the media was a coconspirator. That should be lesson number one.
Lesson sadly learned farther back even. Thank you for your exceptional research studies and writing on these. It’s not easy to accept truth when it affects everything you’ve known about right and wrong, logical vs. ignorant ideas, etc. Even spirituality is questioned by some. Hard to believe that one from my point of view. I’ll keep hanging on to the good and positive messages and thank goodness for people like yourself. Thank you!
Sep 11, 2023·edited Sep 11, 2023Liked by Madhava Setty
An insult to average intelligence also: the most commonly perceivable discrepancies in the official 9/11 narrative attest to the undeniable fact that most people make up their minds first, then process evidence selectively to corroborate the narratives that best support their existential need for external assurances of safety. Those who saw- and continue to clearly discern personally inconvenient truths, can be said to be the most courageous and honest (the least self-deceiving) among humans.
I didn't judge those who didn't see 9/11 for what it was: controlled demolition...But I did notice that the sudden, derogatory use of term 'conspiracy theorist' came from what seemed a deliberate distortion and demonization of the term. Why not conspiracy hypothesis? The mind imposes its own limitations on everything it sees, but intuition doesn't. The mere notion of Conspiracy Theorist (what is so derogatory about someone who hypothesizes conspiracy?) is an imposted limitation onto everything the mind doesn't want to see.
But I did judge those who didn't see the pandemic for the falsity that it was. And my judgments nearly destroyed me... yet I learned that the horrors of the last 3 years effectively woke me up to- and "saved me" from -the toxicities of a judging mind.
When confronted with horrible pain, including the pain of fear, the opportunity to up-level our consciousness is more precious than anything that could be lost through unfortunate incidents or catastrophic events. The alternative is to sell one's soul to the devil (to the self-deception of denial) for the tenuous promise of peace from an illegitimate promise of safety.
That's where I find my peace amidst the tragic events in this debilitating, 'changing world.' A non-judging mind can find guilt nowhere to exist... and that feels like the last step into complete freedom from fear. Mourn the pain but bless the fruit of 9/11, bless the fruit of the pandemic, bless the horrors yet to come, for they will strengthen those who have the courage to use the opportunities therein, rather than to collapse to the fear mongering imperatives "to comply for the safety of all."
I’m feeling sad at the multitude of losses. The lives lost here and around the world. The loss of faith in the media, government and institutions. The loss of a shared reality with others. The loss of friends. The loss of voice. The loss of trust. The loss of hope. For me, 9/11 symbolizes the day our music died. But, we survived and our spirit wasn’t extinguished. In the face of all this darkness, your bravery and truth telling are incredibly inspiring. There are many losses, but much to celebrate. I’m thankful for waking up, seeing the truth, discovering strengths, and learning to trust my eyes and mind in the face authoritative propaganda. We are in dark times but I will continue to have faith, hope and love. Thank you for the strength brother!
You are welcome. Never forget what humanity's potential would be once we become aware of what is transpiring. We are a species that is naturally loving with only a tiny few that are psychopaths. That is never the message we hear when we turn on the news.
The majority of the heinous acts in our history were not committed by those who were targeted. They were conducted by the ones who control the narrative. Once we come to that understanding a new light will be cast on the planet.
Sep 11, 2023·edited Sep 11, 2023Liked by Madhava Setty
Recommending "The Trigger" by David Icke. Twenty-five years ago, I thought the man a bit mad, but NO!...He is quite freakin' sane, as are you, Dr Setty. Happy birthday to your son; its my sister's birthday, too. My brother was one of the brave men who cleaned up that murderous disaster. Like losing JFK, we will remember exactly where we were....
there was no cell reception from above 5000 ft in 2001. so no one could have made a cell phone call from those planes. No plane parts or bodies...from the Pentagon 911 event or the Pennsylvania 911 event. none in Manhattan either.
So many anomalies that it makes you wonder how we all could have been so foolish. Well the media reporters are very good actors. The one that takes the cake was the appearance of Mohammed Atta’s passport clean and unharmed found on the sidewalk a few blocks away from Ground Zero. Think about how absurd the idea would be as to how it arrived there if he actually had it when walked he walked onto the plane. Did Atta roll down the window of the plane and toss it out right before impact? And this was confirming evidence that it was an Al Qiuda attack.
No, surprisingly, it's not. My last plane crash call, I found the pilot's log book well away from the cockpit, wet from the snow on the ground and the fire suppressant used to extinguish the fire, but otherwise pristine. Like tornadoes, plane crashes do peculiar things.
You're a plane crash investigator ? But these planes flew into buildings, they did not crash land on snow, and not even a massive wheel or jet engine was recovered from the wreckage or debris field (if you could even call it that, since there was almost nothing on the ground). How do you explain that ?
So, do you think the planes and the holes in the towers, were just an illusion, a "Holographic Insert" deep faked into our reality, like the Marian Apparitions ? There were some other things that didn't quite add up to how stuff normally works in our reality even if you do accept that the towers were turned to fine dust by esoteric energy, while falling, i.e. when WTC-2 came down, the top part broke off and started tipping eastward, yet it righted itself on the way down while turning to dust. It's like the script was for it to come straight down so it didn't take out any other buildings around the WTC complex, so they had to edit the action as it was unfolding.
To be honest, I don't know what was flown into the towers or Pentagon, or that field in PA, but there was no physical evidence it was airliners, not in any of those places. Remember, building 7 also went down, yet was never hit, too. Keep in mind too, in the '50s jet fuel was developed to burn "cooler" than the high octane gasoline used in older reciprocator airliners, for the express purpose of being less lethal in crash scenarios. It does not burn hot enough to melt or soften modern steel building structures,and those buildings went up after it was developed and in use.
Also keep in mind, media are very good at telling us what we "see", even when it is NOT what our eyes are taking in! For example, we all "saw" Officer Chauvin "choke" George Floyd to death; well, so media SAID! Not all of us did see that. And the autopsy evidence did not find that either. The autopsy showed NO bruising externally, or on the internal tissues around the trachea or great vessels; where there was bruising is over the scapular region of Floyd's back, because Chauvin's knee was over the scapula, as he was trained to place it, for restraint purposes. And that, is precisely what I, as a trained and experienced EMS 1st responder, saw in the videos, as did a few others.. Yet, to this day, media STILL claim Chauvin murdered Floyd, both mainstream and alternative, because that was what they were told to see, just as we were told to see airliners crash into the towers and Pentagon. The marks left in PA, look more,to me, like a large, maybe torpedo sized, missile of some sort, but again, ZERO evidence of an airliner crashing there, No wings, engines, tail assembly, landing gear trucks, nothing to show a large airliner hit there, just a large crater. And those aren't the only examples of media told us to see something that wasn't actually what was there. We are conditioned to believe "authorities", even when they are in conflict with reality, unless, for some reason, like EMS, it's trained out of us, because we have to evaluate information without verbal input.
We also don't know what kind of time delay was involved, on 9/11, unless we were in lower Manhattan at the time, watching it unfold.
There were phones in the planes, and satellite phones did work back then, but no, regular ell phones of that era, wouldn't work above 5K, and they weren't below that level long enough.
Your intuition was right on target Dr Setty. While it was plain as day for some of us who questioned it that something very ominous was afoot between 2001 and 2020, so many people were sound asleep in the Twilight Zone, unaware that all was not as it appeared. They often would roll their eyes and shake their heads at the mere thought that 9/11 was not what the smiling talking heads fed them.
But the plandemic with its ridiculous protocols based on foolishness followed by the massive mRNA marketing ploy was enough to cause a growing number of us to start to question everything including 9/11, geo-engineering, the 5G menace and even the climate agenda as a Trojan horse leading to a New World Order. Seeing how many Substack readers I’ve run into in the comments sections who are keen to learn about these serious threats despite the hidden denial created by the corrupt media, you get a feeling people are waking up in droves. As far as I’m concerned, it can’t happen fast enough.
Long-in-the-making manipulated events have been attributed to random, unrelated acts, when they are, in truth, premeditated attacks - heinous and unthinkable crimes against humanity - meant to dismantle the foundation of contemporary systems and cultures to achieve enough upheaval to "reset" this planet's tier of hierarchies toward totalitarian control.
The underpinnings of these attacks are imbedded in so many layers of tyranny and deceit that the degrees of "deep darkness" defy inspection and discovery. The lynchpin perpetrators function in a war-room of think-tank strategy, while we fastidiously seek every crumb and clue. Our efforts are noble, and results forthcoming, but they cannot keep up with the veil of secrecy that eludes painstaking illumination. It is not difficult to visualize scenarios involving formidable technology and science, engineered as weapons, should enough critical mass develop in our efforts to push back.
It was inconceivable - the takedown of edifices of power and wealth, a shocking 22 years ago. Like other atrocities in history, accounts of events will be rewritten to propagandize a generation of youth who were not yet born when we watched the unthinkable unfold.
You have a choice: Move through events in a delusional fear-induced coma - indifferent or oblivious - or face, head-on, the choking asphyxia of truthful accounts of all such events with eyes open. If the pending cataclysm were news of a comet hurtling toward us, it would not one-up the prospect of our impending battle against the forces of evil.
You’re absolutely right. That’s why I willfully repeat that there is no power greater than love, except the unity of all the blessings said in the name of All that is good. To be sure, it’s not a proclamation of my faith, but a plea to all mankind, that we can overcome anything with love first, second and always. Thank you for sharing your own. That’s a prayer I wish for every belief to embrace.
Wow! This is a hell of an eye opener. Before seeing this I was very skeptical about bldgs 1 and 2 and 50/50 on bldg 7. I didn’t go through all of this but at this point I’m convinced about all 3. Thank you for putting this together! Keep up the great work!
The videos that played over and over and over on the news....created the narrative...about planes. A friend who lived and worked right there during this event....said NO ONE spoke about planes or saw any planes.....only explosions were discussed. Also roads were blocked, cell phones stopped working, people were trapped in town...just like in Lahaina. Then there was a lockdown....and you were not supposed to travel out of the area ...as shared by this friend.
David Icke did a very good expose on this with Foster Gamble on his Freedom Portal show. Which is now called Free to Thrive.
Right on. there were no planes. The nose of a plane is badly damaged when flies into flock of birds. There is no way a plane could penetrate a steel and concrete building. You tube video about planes flying into birds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f-3BrPXOEQ
Sorry, but yes, it could, and they have done, however, the wings, and/ or tail assembly generally rip or break off, when they do so. Where did those go?
Sep 12, 2023·edited Sep 12, 2023Liked by Madhava Setty
No, the truth about 9-11 will never die, just as "who really killed President Kennedy," will never be forgotten. These notes of dissent, may live on as rhetorical questions rather than actual answers, since there will likely be no firm consensus on exactly who was behind either, but the official account will always be shadowed by these alternate theories and "conspiracy" does mean "an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime" so we mustn't be afraid to use the term since it's accurate, despite its manipulated implication of standing outside the norms of society when doing so.
A few months ago i bought Dr. Judy Wood's book, Where Did the Towers Go?: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11. It is a heavy hardcover, printed on photo paper since it is filled with photographic evidence from the scene, as well as graphs and charts. Dr. Wood doesn't make absolute conclusions, she only shows the actual evidence, organized by the obvious questions, against a backdrop of normal reality, so the reader can begin to see the truth for themselves rather than be swept up in the wave of unconscious collusion among all those who allow the propaganda to drive their perception and see nothing wrong with the picture. See also her YouTube channel: youtube.com/@911EmpiricalEvidence
Personally, i have my own theory which does satisfy some of the difficult issues raised by Dr. Wood. i believe the "directed energy" that must have been used to turn masonry and steel to fine dust while in free fall, came from the ground and was concentrated w/in the "bathtub", a 'container' of concrete walls that WTC buildings 1, 2, 3, 4 ,5 & 6 were built w/in, and which kept the sea water from inundating their substructures. WTC-7 was outside the bathtub and i believe it was taken down in a different way, not with the directed energy that came from the ground. It's possible Building 7 was a conventional controlled demolition, since it did leave the expected pile of debris. Building 7 was destroyed conventionally so as to create an incongruity and detract from the esoteric means used to take down the towers and the other buildings in the bathtub. (All the WTC buildings in the bathtub were affected by the esoteric energy, even though they might not have completely collapsed like the towers did.)
On the live feed on TV, an official even announced before Building 7 came down, that they were "pulling it" (conventionally blowing it up), so as to make it seem all of the other buildings were similarly taken down, as they expected theories to come up along these lines. They introduced this conventional incongruity to prevent people believing it was something more esoteric -- likely scalar pulses transmitted underground -- since this technology is top secret. They expected those who did not fall for the official explanation of burning fuel from the planes, would assume all the buildings must have come down by the same alternate means -- the most reasonable being how Building 7 was "pulled", despite the fact that controlled demolition is not able to pulverize metal into fine dust.
But we are now seeing the same esoteric technology being applied in Lahaina, the wildfires over the last decade in Calif., as well as probably the fires which started all at the same time on June 2nd, in northern Quebec. Compare the evidence of the burned out cars with melted metal and glass, while plastics and rubber components were untouched -- in Lahaina https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/lahaina-a-modern-day-pearl-harbor ; the Calif. wildfires https://youtu.be/mHeoaIh7cx8 ; as well as the "weird cold fires" in cars that were observed on streets around the WTC complex (see Dr. Wood's videos). Many of the witnesses in the recent wildfires have also described the fires coming up from the ground.
Another piece of testimonial evidence that it was esoteric energy from the ground, was provided by the manager of maintenance in one of the WTC towers, who was on a mission for a while, to make people aware of what he witnessed 15 minutes before the first plane (supposedly) hit. In one of the subbasements he encountered one of his workers and saw that all the skin on his body had started to peel of. This was before anything else on 9-11 was noticed as being out of the ordinary. Esoteric energy which causes people's skin to peel off and which must be very painful, is also a plausible explanation for the hundreds of jumpers who leapt out of the towers' windows apparently impelled to do so to try to avoid something even more immediately unbearable, than the prospect of their own death.
The esoteric nature of the destruction of the buildings on 9-11 is also in-line with the weird behaviour of the hurricane which was stalled just off Manhattan on that day (and which was not even mentioned in weather reports at the time, but was being measured and studied intensely by hurricane researchers). After the buildings came down, the hurricane made a sudden shift to the northeast, as if impelled by some great and unexplained force. Some have even suggested that the hurricane was being mined for the energy which then took down the buildings, and that after it was no longer needed, it was quickly sent on its way.
Who was directing this esoteric energy, and how was it done, is something that will need to be researched further and all the many disparate clues taken into consideration. But it's interesting to see where the truth currently stands, with regard to 9-11 as compared with Kennedy's assassination. The book on the latter, that is being recommended by RFK Jr., JFK and the Unspeakable, lays out all the research since 1963 that has yielded up the picture of what actually happened. Basically, as is concluded by the author, James Douglass, we do now have an extremely cogent and convincing understanding of who really killed Kennedy and how they did it, primarily due to the many witnesses who came forward despite threats and reprisals, one person even accepting being committed to a mental asylum for the rest of his life, rather than retracting his testimony of what he had witnessed.
9-11 was certainly a much bigger operation than a couple of CIA spooks on a grassy knoll with a sniper's rifle, but where are all the whistleblowers today, for what they must obviously be aware, is the small part they did witness about how 9-11 was set up, or its aftermath covered up ? Very few people today, seem willing to let the truth as they know it, stand against all odds-- just because it is the truth, and because they believe truth can only be upheld by everyone's personal commitment to it.
Thank you for introducing this profoundly important 'elephant in the room'. It is terrifying to imagine that someone or something has the power to "turn buildings to dust in mid-air", but (as so expertly laid out by Dr Wood in WDTTG) that power exists, and has been weaponised against humanity. God Bless Dr Wood, and those like researcher Andrew Johnson who have supported her in the face of so much vilification. His books '9/11 finding the Truth' and '9/11, Holding the Truth' are an indictment of a second layer of deception. This is designed to quell the knowledge that a form of free/cheap energy exists, which could transform all our lives for the better. Bless Elsa too, for giving Andrew the opportunity to openly denounce this deception. Here is a link to the closing comments of her recent excellent 'Truth Summit':
Yes Petra I too bought Dr Judy Woods book about 4/5 years after this diabolical act. I couldn’t believe this had happened with so many people dying I felt compelled to find any information I could on this tragedy. Also bought the video (on a CD) of a compilation of the event. The film’s director, Dylan Avery, that produced it was called “Loose Change”. That video confirmed my suspicions on the absurdity of what they claimed with these “terrorists” who couldn’t fly a plane to save themselves let alone a jet ✈️ I believe it was a direct energy weapon plane that the US has in their possession which can direct a laser beam to an exact spot like the Paradise fires in California and the Lahaina wildfires. From videos I’ve seen the cars parked along the roads where people couldn’t escape because the police were blocking roads, all those vehicles were burned exactly the same as the 9/11 vehicles. A wildfire doesn’t melt metal cars, nor does debris from a falling building in the 9/11 scenario. 🤪
My research started the day after 9/11 and continues to this day.
I'm dumbfounded. I knew nothing about any of this. I was busy with young children at the time - and on the west coast. I'm a skeptic these days about all our institutions and never believed the WMD narrative but I've never run across this information before. I'll have to learn more. Thanks for providing.
It’s very encouraging to read your comment. Beware of inaccurate information coming from the truther side as well. I would suggest starting with the long essay I wrote in 2019. I had the good fortune of receiving guidance from Richard Gage and Tony Szamboti to ensure my interpretation of the information was technically correct. They are both giants in this movement.
NO planes hit those towers. No plane can go right through and come out the other side. The video that shows a Road Runner type cartoon with a dark area the shape of a plane on the opposite side where a plane supposedly went through. REALLY????? Impossible......Impossible.
Curious if you have seen book or newer video by Dr. Judy Wood, "Where Did the Towers Go?" She covers some of the same subjects you wrote about. I read every word of that book; studied every photo. Her premise is directed energy weapons, but in the book she only states facts. Absolute proof. Astonishing. I show the book to people and explain things and they look defensive and refuse to believe it. Sigh.
Only after multiple exposures - like 15 - from a pressing,"crazy" uncle was I able to be objective, bldg 7 collapse and the video on youtube with all the engineers was what finally opened my eyes. Your MIT engineer bros will be idiots for the next 14 exposures.... overcoming narrative is a major psych hurdle, that is detested at first....
I am once again impressed by the content and tone of the comments on this provocative piece. Thank you all for creating a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas. This is has always been my motivation for creating this substack.
Several readers have brought up the work of Dr. Judy Wood. I appreciate her efforts. I appreciate that she is able to separate fact from speculation. As someone who took 16 years to question the official explanation I am very impressed by the fact that she knew immediately that we were being lied to and that she did not hesitate to make her position known.
Could it have been a directed energy weapon? Absolutely. However, as I am sure she would acknowledge, it is impossible to know with certainty. I am not an expert in such technology. It would be irresponsible for me to opine on this. I am sad to see the truth movement become internally at odds over things we cannot know for sure.
My interest is to create curiosity about what we were told. This is a tall order because asking questions about this event immediately leads to very dark places. This is why my approach has been to separate what can be known from guesswork. This was the strategy I used four years ago: identify the impossibilities of the official explanation and then identify the improbabilities. It is our inability to distinguish the two that keeps us locked in our loyalty to the official narrative.
Many who discount the 9/11 truth movement use the sole argument that too many people would have been involved in such a cover up. It would be impossible for such a thing to be kept secret.
It is not impossible. It is only improbable. There is a world of difference between the two. 80 years ago tens of thousands of people were peripherally involved in the creation of the A-bomb. Very few knew what the big picture was. Truman was unaware of the Manhattan project until the day after FDR died.
This leads to the question, where are the whistleblowers? Surely someone would have come forward! It is not so hard to keep people quiet. There are carrots (several high ranking members of NIST involved in their pseudo investigation obtained large promotions). There are sticks (undoubtedly these same folks were threatened with retribution if they asked too many questions). But that is not the real leverage point. Whoever was responsible for this heinous event clearly controls the media. What would be the point in coming forward if you will be vilified? It is the media that determines whether a person is a whistleblower or a nut-job looking for publicity. The absence of whistleblowers does not prove there was no conspiracy.
Finally there is the question of planes. First it is vital to see that approaching someone who may be open to hearing an alternative explanation will shut down their inquiry if they hear that no planes hit the buildings. If you happen to believe there were no planes I suggest using a different approach.
Second, the movie "September Clues" offers "official" video that shows the nose cone of the second plane emerging intact on the other side of the building. This is clearly impossible. But how are we to verify that this is an authentic video of what was shown on TV? Could it be counterintelligence designed to drive the "no plane" hypothesis to confuse the public even more? I certainly don't know.
This brings up another very important point. Some people believe that aluminum planes could never slice through steel beams. This is untrue. Though the strength of steel and concrete is much greater than aluminum, it doesn't mean that a collision of sufficient energy couldn't destroy steel and concrete. This is easily demonstrated by the pictures we see of plane nose cones severely damaged by collisions with seagulls offered as proof that aluminum fuselage is no match for steel. "Look how fragile planes are!" Yes, they are fragile. But why did a bird do such damage to them? It is the energy of impact that determines what gets destroyed. A peanut hitting a steel plate with sufficient velocity will leave a dent.
The point here is that when a plane hits steel, the steel may be destroyed. But if the steel gets destroyed, the plane will be too. This is certain. This is important because there was very little left of the plane to damage the central columns, something necessary to destroy the twin towers.
So what, if anything, struck the twin towers? I don't know. I am quite confident that it wasn't two commercial airplanes flown by jihadists with single engine licenses on a suicide mission. Whoever orchestrated this tragedy would have never banked on the fact that they wouldn't lose their nerve or that they would assuredly hit their targets with pinpoint accuracy. The entire op would have failed if one of those things occurred.
I now speculate...
61 years ago the military hawks surrounding JFK suggested an operation that would make it seem like an American civil aircraft was shot down by Cuban MIG fighters in order to create a pretense for a military invasion of Cuba. The civilian aircraft would be boarded by operatives with aliases. Midflight, their transponder would shut off and be replaced by one transmitted from a drone craft painted to look the civilian plane. The craft with operatives aboard would land at Elgin AFB while the drone would be intentionally crashed. Thus it would be easy to create the story that the Cuban military took hostile action against American civilians.
This devious plan was called "Operation Northwoods". JFK wouldn't go along with it, but the similarities between this proposal and what might have happened on 9/11 are hard to miss.
How do we know this plan was suggested? Here is the link to the document obtained via a FOIA request (read page 10 of the annex):
https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
Of course I have no idea if this was the strategy used. However, this document is proof of the pure psychopathy behind the war machine back then which is assuredly alive and well today.
So then, what happened to the people aboard the four planes that were hijacked? If they followed this plan, the pilots and flight attendants on these planes were "operatives". They landed the planes secretly on various airbases. The passengers were offered apologies for the inconvenience. They were told they were part of a very real military exercise involving simulated attacks from commercial jet planes and they would be on their way very soon.
Meanwhile some sort of military craft was remotely guided with pinpoint accuracy to each twin tower.
The passengers were instructed to call their loved ones to let them know that had been hijacked and that the culprits were of middle eastern descent. This would explain how these cellphone calls were completed in 2001. But why were they instructed to do this?
Answer: This would offer powerful eyewitness testimony that would be hard to contest. There was a hijacking. The perpetrators were jihadists. What happened to them next is up to you to decide...
Again. I am only speculating.
Your “Welcome to the Club of No Return” moment was the same as mine: seeing WTC 7 collapsing for the first time (4 years after 9/11.)
It was stunningly obvious even to someone whose structural engineering experience was confined to collapsing sand castles on the beach.
Like you, my most profound surprise was the dismissive and/or hostile reactions of intelligent friends and family.
By the time the Plandemic was initiated I understood far more about the human mind’s need to “understand” (aka BE TOLD WHAT TO BELIEVE.) The designers of both events leveraged a human psychological glitch. They did it brilliantly.
"It was stunningly obvious even to someone whose structural engineering experience was confined to collapsing sand castles on the beach."
Love that!
I agree that it was done brilliantly. However it only worked because of the role of legacy media. If they did their job and ran the slo-mo video of the North tower coming down as often as they flashed bin Laden's face there is no way the public would have bought the story.
We may never discover who was behind this. We can be certain that the media was a coconspirator. That should be lesson number one.
Lesson sadly learned farther back even. Thank you for your exceptional research studies and writing on these. It’s not easy to accept truth when it affects everything you’ve known about right and wrong, logical vs. ignorant ideas, etc. Even spirituality is questioned by some. Hard to believe that one from my point of view. I’ll keep hanging on to the good and positive messages and thank goodness for people like yourself. Thank you!
An insult to average intelligence also: the most commonly perceivable discrepancies in the official 9/11 narrative attest to the undeniable fact that most people make up their minds first, then process evidence selectively to corroborate the narratives that best support their existential need for external assurances of safety. Those who saw- and continue to clearly discern personally inconvenient truths, can be said to be the most courageous and honest (the least self-deceiving) among humans.
I didn't judge those who didn't see 9/11 for what it was: controlled demolition...But I did notice that the sudden, derogatory use of term 'conspiracy theorist' came from what seemed a deliberate distortion and demonization of the term. Why not conspiracy hypothesis? The mind imposes its own limitations on everything it sees, but intuition doesn't. The mere notion of Conspiracy Theorist (what is so derogatory about someone who hypothesizes conspiracy?) is an imposted limitation onto everything the mind doesn't want to see.
But I did judge those who didn't see the pandemic for the falsity that it was. And my judgments nearly destroyed me... yet I learned that the horrors of the last 3 years effectively woke me up to- and "saved me" from -the toxicities of a judging mind.
When confronted with horrible pain, including the pain of fear, the opportunity to up-level our consciousness is more precious than anything that could be lost through unfortunate incidents or catastrophic events. The alternative is to sell one's soul to the devil (to the self-deception of denial) for the tenuous promise of peace from an illegitimate promise of safety.
That's where I find my peace amidst the tragic events in this debilitating, 'changing world.' A non-judging mind can find guilt nowhere to exist... and that feels like the last step into complete freedom from fear. Mourn the pain but bless the fruit of 9/11, bless the fruit of the pandemic, bless the horrors yet to come, for they will strengthen those who have the courage to use the opportunities therein, rather than to collapse to the fear mongering imperatives "to comply for the safety of all."
Beautifully said.
You’ve said it ALL! Thank you 🙏🏼😊
I’m feeling sad at the multitude of losses. The lives lost here and around the world. The loss of faith in the media, government and institutions. The loss of a shared reality with others. The loss of friends. The loss of voice. The loss of trust. The loss of hope. For me, 9/11 symbolizes the day our music died. But, we survived and our spirit wasn’t extinguished. In the face of all this darkness, your bravery and truth telling are incredibly inspiring. There are many losses, but much to celebrate. I’m thankful for waking up, seeing the truth, discovering strengths, and learning to trust my eyes and mind in the face authoritative propaganda. We are in dark times but I will continue to have faith, hope and love. Thank you for the strength brother!
You are welcome. Never forget what humanity's potential would be once we become aware of what is transpiring. We are a species that is naturally loving with only a tiny few that are psychopaths. That is never the message we hear when we turn on the news.
The majority of the heinous acts in our history were not committed by those who were targeted. They were conducted by the ones who control the narrative. Once we come to that understanding a new light will be cast on the planet.
This is nothing new. It's been happening for many years
Recommending "The Trigger" by David Icke. Twenty-five years ago, I thought the man a bit mad, but NO!...He is quite freakin' sane, as are you, Dr Setty. Happy birthday to your son; its my sister's birthday, too. My brother was one of the brave men who cleaned up that murderous disaster. Like losing JFK, we will remember exactly where we were....
Icke also talks about THE TRIGGER in extreme detail in an interview with Brian Rose, in case one only has a few hours to take it all in: https://londonreal.tv/david-icke-9-11-the-trigger-the-lie-that-changed-the-world-who-really-did-it-and-why/
Yes, that was a great interview!
there was no cell reception from above 5000 ft in 2001. so no one could have made a cell phone call from those planes. No plane parts or bodies...from the Pentagon 911 event or the Pennsylvania 911 event. none in Manhattan either.
So many anomalies that it makes you wonder how we all could have been so foolish. Well the media reporters are very good actors. The one that takes the cake was the appearance of Mohammed Atta’s passport clean and unharmed found on the sidewalk a few blocks away from Ground Zero. Think about how absurd the idea would be as to how it arrived there if he actually had it when walked he walked onto the plane. Did Atta roll down the window of the plane and toss it out right before impact? And this was confirming evidence that it was an Al Qiuda attack.
No, surprisingly, it's not. My last plane crash call, I found the pilot's log book well away from the cockpit, wet from the snow on the ground and the fire suppressant used to extinguish the fire, but otherwise pristine. Like tornadoes, plane crashes do peculiar things.
You're a plane crash investigator ? But these planes flew into buildings, they did not crash land on snow, and not even a massive wheel or jet engine was recovered from the wreckage or debris field (if you could even call it that, since there was almost nothing on the ground). How do you explain that ?
That sir, is my point; there SHOULD have been.
So, do you think the planes and the holes in the towers, were just an illusion, a "Holographic Insert" deep faked into our reality, like the Marian Apparitions ? There were some other things that didn't quite add up to how stuff normally works in our reality even if you do accept that the towers were turned to fine dust by esoteric energy, while falling, i.e. when WTC-2 came down, the top part broke off and started tipping eastward, yet it righted itself on the way down while turning to dust. It's like the script was for it to come straight down so it didn't take out any other buildings around the WTC complex, so they had to edit the action as it was unfolding.
To be honest, I don't know what was flown into the towers or Pentagon, or that field in PA, but there was no physical evidence it was airliners, not in any of those places. Remember, building 7 also went down, yet was never hit, too. Keep in mind too, in the '50s jet fuel was developed to burn "cooler" than the high octane gasoline used in older reciprocator airliners, for the express purpose of being less lethal in crash scenarios. It does not burn hot enough to melt or soften modern steel building structures,and those buildings went up after it was developed and in use.
Also keep in mind, media are very good at telling us what we "see", even when it is NOT what our eyes are taking in! For example, we all "saw" Officer Chauvin "choke" George Floyd to death; well, so media SAID! Not all of us did see that. And the autopsy evidence did not find that either. The autopsy showed NO bruising externally, or on the internal tissues around the trachea or great vessels; where there was bruising is over the scapular region of Floyd's back, because Chauvin's knee was over the scapula, as he was trained to place it, for restraint purposes. And that, is precisely what I, as a trained and experienced EMS 1st responder, saw in the videos, as did a few others.. Yet, to this day, media STILL claim Chauvin murdered Floyd, both mainstream and alternative, because that was what they were told to see, just as we were told to see airliners crash into the towers and Pentagon. The marks left in PA, look more,to me, like a large, maybe torpedo sized, missile of some sort, but again, ZERO evidence of an airliner crashing there, No wings, engines, tail assembly, landing gear trucks, nothing to show a large airliner hit there, just a large crater. And those aren't the only examples of media told us to see something that wasn't actually what was there. We are conditioned to believe "authorities", even when they are in conflict with reality, unless, for some reason, like EMS, it's trained out of us, because we have to evaluate information without verbal input.
We also don't know what kind of time delay was involved, on 9/11, unless we were in lower Manhattan at the time, watching it unfold.
There were phones in the planes, and satellite phones did work back then, but no, regular ell phones of that era, wouldn't work above 5K, and they weren't below that level long enough.
Your intuition was right on target Dr Setty. While it was plain as day for some of us who questioned it that something very ominous was afoot between 2001 and 2020, so many people were sound asleep in the Twilight Zone, unaware that all was not as it appeared. They often would roll their eyes and shake their heads at the mere thought that 9/11 was not what the smiling talking heads fed them.
But the plandemic with its ridiculous protocols based on foolishness followed by the massive mRNA marketing ploy was enough to cause a growing number of us to start to question everything including 9/11, geo-engineering, the 5G menace and even the climate agenda as a Trojan horse leading to a New World Order. Seeing how many Substack readers I’ve run into in the comments sections who are keen to learn about these serious threats despite the hidden denial created by the corrupt media, you get a feeling people are waking up in droves. As far as I’m concerned, it can’t happen fast enough.
Got that- all right on and well said! Truth is Freedom.
Long-in-the-making manipulated events have been attributed to random, unrelated acts, when they are, in truth, premeditated attacks - heinous and unthinkable crimes against humanity - meant to dismantle the foundation of contemporary systems and cultures to achieve enough upheaval to "reset" this planet's tier of hierarchies toward totalitarian control.
The underpinnings of these attacks are imbedded in so many layers of tyranny and deceit that the degrees of "deep darkness" defy inspection and discovery. The lynchpin perpetrators function in a war-room of think-tank strategy, while we fastidiously seek every crumb and clue. Our efforts are noble, and results forthcoming, but they cannot keep up with the veil of secrecy that eludes painstaking illumination. It is not difficult to visualize scenarios involving formidable technology and science, engineered as weapons, should enough critical mass develop in our efforts to push back.
It was inconceivable - the takedown of edifices of power and wealth, a shocking 22 years ago. Like other atrocities in history, accounts of events will be rewritten to propagandize a generation of youth who were not yet born when we watched the unthinkable unfold.
You have a choice: Move through events in a delusional fear-induced coma - indifferent or oblivious - or face, head-on, the choking asphyxia of truthful accounts of all such events with eyes open. If the pending cataclysm were news of a comet hurtling toward us, it would not one-up the prospect of our impending battle against the forces of evil.
You’re absolutely right. That’s why I willfully repeat that there is no power greater than love, except the unity of all the blessings said in the name of All that is good. To be sure, it’s not a proclamation of my faith, but a plea to all mankind, that we can overcome anything with love first, second and always. Thank you for sharing your own. That’s a prayer I wish for every belief to embrace.
Wow! This is a hell of an eye opener. Before seeing this I was very skeptical about bldgs 1 and 2 and 50/50 on bldg 7. I didn’t go through all of this but at this point I’m convinced about all 3. Thank you for putting this together! Keep up the great work!
The videos that played over and over and over on the news....created the narrative...about planes. A friend who lived and worked right there during this event....said NO ONE spoke about planes or saw any planes.....only explosions were discussed. Also roads were blocked, cell phones stopped working, people were trapped in town...just like in Lahaina. Then there was a lockdown....and you were not supposed to travel out of the area ...as shared by this friend.
David Icke did a very good expose on this with Foster Gamble on his Freedom Portal show. Which is now called Free to Thrive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcklkSW36nI
Right on. there were no planes. The nose of a plane is badly damaged when flies into flock of birds. There is no way a plane could penetrate a steel and concrete building. You tube video about planes flying into birds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f-3BrPXOEQ
Sorry, but yes, it could, and they have done, however, the wings, and/ or tail assembly generally rip or break off, when they do so. Where did those go?
No, the truth about 9-11 will never die, just as "who really killed President Kennedy," will never be forgotten. These notes of dissent, may live on as rhetorical questions rather than actual answers, since there will likely be no firm consensus on exactly who was behind either, but the official account will always be shadowed by these alternate theories and "conspiracy" does mean "an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime" so we mustn't be afraid to use the term since it's accurate, despite its manipulated implication of standing outside the norms of society when doing so.
A few months ago i bought Dr. Judy Wood's book, Where Did the Towers Go?: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11. It is a heavy hardcover, printed on photo paper since it is filled with photographic evidence from the scene, as well as graphs and charts. Dr. Wood doesn't make absolute conclusions, she only shows the actual evidence, organized by the obvious questions, against a backdrop of normal reality, so the reader can begin to see the truth for themselves rather than be swept up in the wave of unconscious collusion among all those who allow the propaganda to drive their perception and see nothing wrong with the picture. See also her YouTube channel: youtube.com/@911EmpiricalEvidence
Personally, i have my own theory which does satisfy some of the difficult issues raised by Dr. Wood. i believe the "directed energy" that must have been used to turn masonry and steel to fine dust while in free fall, came from the ground and was concentrated w/in the "bathtub", a 'container' of concrete walls that WTC buildings 1, 2, 3, 4 ,5 & 6 were built w/in, and which kept the sea water from inundating their substructures. WTC-7 was outside the bathtub and i believe it was taken down in a different way, not with the directed energy that came from the ground. It's possible Building 7 was a conventional controlled demolition, since it did leave the expected pile of debris. Building 7 was destroyed conventionally so as to create an incongruity and detract from the esoteric means used to take down the towers and the other buildings in the bathtub. (All the WTC buildings in the bathtub were affected by the esoteric energy, even though they might not have completely collapsed like the towers did.)
On the live feed on TV, an official even announced before Building 7 came down, that they were "pulling it" (conventionally blowing it up), so as to make it seem all of the other buildings were similarly taken down, as they expected theories to come up along these lines. They introduced this conventional incongruity to prevent people believing it was something more esoteric -- likely scalar pulses transmitted underground -- since this technology is top secret. They expected those who did not fall for the official explanation of burning fuel from the planes, would assume all the buildings must have come down by the same alternate means -- the most reasonable being how Building 7 was "pulled", despite the fact that controlled demolition is not able to pulverize metal into fine dust.
But we are now seeing the same esoteric technology being applied in Lahaina, the wildfires over the last decade in Calif., as well as probably the fires which started all at the same time on June 2nd, in northern Quebec. Compare the evidence of the burned out cars with melted metal and glass, while plastics and rubber components were untouched -- in Lahaina https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/lahaina-a-modern-day-pearl-harbor ; the Calif. wildfires https://youtu.be/mHeoaIh7cx8 ; as well as the "weird cold fires" in cars that were observed on streets around the WTC complex (see Dr. Wood's videos). Many of the witnesses in the recent wildfires have also described the fires coming up from the ground.
Another piece of testimonial evidence that it was esoteric energy from the ground, was provided by the manager of maintenance in one of the WTC towers, who was on a mission for a while, to make people aware of what he witnessed 15 minutes before the first plane (supposedly) hit. In one of the subbasements he encountered one of his workers and saw that all the skin on his body had started to peel of. This was before anything else on 9-11 was noticed as being out of the ordinary. Esoteric energy which causes people's skin to peel off and which must be very painful, is also a plausible explanation for the hundreds of jumpers who leapt out of the towers' windows apparently impelled to do so to try to avoid something even more immediately unbearable, than the prospect of their own death.
The esoteric nature of the destruction of the buildings on 9-11 is also in-line with the weird behaviour of the hurricane which was stalled just off Manhattan on that day (and which was not even mentioned in weather reports at the time, but was being measured and studied intensely by hurricane researchers). After the buildings came down, the hurricane made a sudden shift to the northeast, as if impelled by some great and unexplained force. Some have even suggested that the hurricane was being mined for the energy which then took down the buildings, and that after it was no longer needed, it was quickly sent on its way.
Who was directing this esoteric energy, and how was it done, is something that will need to be researched further and all the many disparate clues taken into consideration. But it's interesting to see where the truth currently stands, with regard to 9-11 as compared with Kennedy's assassination. The book on the latter, that is being recommended by RFK Jr., JFK and the Unspeakable, lays out all the research since 1963 that has yielded up the picture of what actually happened. Basically, as is concluded by the author, James Douglass, we do now have an extremely cogent and convincing understanding of who really killed Kennedy and how they did it, primarily due to the many witnesses who came forward despite threats and reprisals, one person even accepting being committed to a mental asylum for the rest of his life, rather than retracting his testimony of what he had witnessed.
9-11 was certainly a much bigger operation than a couple of CIA spooks on a grassy knoll with a sniper's rifle, but where are all the whistleblowers today, for what they must obviously be aware, is the small part they did witness about how 9-11 was set up, or its aftermath covered up ? Very few people today, seem willing to let the truth as they know it, stand against all odds-- just because it is the truth, and because they believe truth can only be upheld by everyone's personal commitment to it.
Thank you for introducing this profoundly important 'elephant in the room'. It is terrifying to imagine that someone or something has the power to "turn buildings to dust in mid-air", but (as so expertly laid out by Dr Wood in WDTTG) that power exists, and has been weaponised against humanity. God Bless Dr Wood, and those like researcher Andrew Johnson who have supported her in the face of so much vilification. His books '9/11 finding the Truth' and '9/11, Holding the Truth' are an indictment of a second layer of deception. This is designed to quell the knowledge that a form of free/cheap energy exists, which could transform all our lives for the better. Bless Elsa too, for giving Andrew the opportunity to openly denounce this deception. Here is a link to the closing comments of her recent excellent 'Truth Summit':
https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2023/06/29/truth-summit-panel-discussion-r-gage-publicly-challenged/
Yes Petra I too bought Dr Judy Woods book about 4/5 years after this diabolical act. I couldn’t believe this had happened with so many people dying I felt compelled to find any information I could on this tragedy. Also bought the video (on a CD) of a compilation of the event. The film’s director, Dylan Avery, that produced it was called “Loose Change”. That video confirmed my suspicions on the absurdity of what they claimed with these “terrorists” who couldn’t fly a plane to save themselves let alone a jet ✈️ I believe it was a direct energy weapon plane that the US has in their possession which can direct a laser beam to an exact spot like the Paradise fires in California and the Lahaina wildfires. From videos I’ve seen the cars parked along the roads where people couldn’t escape because the police were blocking roads, all those vehicles were burned exactly the same as the 9/11 vehicles. A wildfire doesn’t melt metal cars, nor does debris from a falling building in the 9/11 scenario. 🤪
My research started the day after 9/11 and continues to this day.
I'm dumbfounded. I knew nothing about any of this. I was busy with young children at the time - and on the west coast. I'm a skeptic these days about all our institutions and never believed the WMD narrative but I've never run across this information before. I'll have to learn more. Thanks for providing.
It’s very encouraging to read your comment. Beware of inaccurate information coming from the truther side as well. I would suggest starting with the long essay I wrote in 2019. I had the good fortune of receiving guidance from Richard Gage and Tony Szamboti to ensure my interpretation of the information was technically correct. They are both giants in this movement.
Can you provide the link to your article? Thank you.
The link to the article is provided at the end of the post.
Here it is again:
https://www.thepulse.one/p/the-official-911-explanation-is-the
NO planes hit those towers. No plane can go right through and come out the other side. The video that shows a Road Runner type cartoon with a dark area the shape of a plane on the opposite side where a plane supposedly went through. REALLY????? Impossible......Impossible.
911... https://t.me/downtherabbitholewegofolks/79526 https://t.me/downtherabbitholewegofolks/80118 https://www.bitchute.com/video/H2RcrIF7onQP/
Curious if you have seen book or newer video by Dr. Judy Wood, "Where Did the Towers Go?" She covers some of the same subjects you wrote about. I read every word of that book; studied every photo. Her premise is directed energy weapons, but in the book she only states facts. Absolute proof. Astonishing. I show the book to people and explain things and they look defensive and refuse to believe it. Sigh.
Yes I have. Please check out my pinned comment above.
Only after multiple exposures - like 15 - from a pressing,"crazy" uncle was I able to be objective, bldg 7 collapse and the video on youtube with all the engineers was what finally opened my eyes. Your MIT engineer bros will be idiots for the next 14 exposures.... overcoming narrative is a major psych hurdle, that is detested at first....
I am interested in your story. What was it about the 15th time?
Yes, seeing this clearly requires an untangling of knots in our subconsciousness and psychology.
ReThink911.org
https://www.ae911truth.org