Discussion about this post

User's avatar
American Nobody's avatar

That's a clear-cut copyright violation, right up to an obvious intention to cause confusion via the book cover design. Sure as hell would be in branding questions, at any rate. The author of the first book should consult a lawyer; could be looking at a big payout not just for damages, but from malicious intent as well. And to get an immediate cease and desist order; that too. It's worth the price of at least one consult, for sure.

Expand full comment
AJR's avatar

“Without a saline placebo as comparison, no claim can be made about a vaccine’s safety profile. Sorry Dr. Wharton, you are wrong and one doesn’t need a medical degree or a masters degree in public health to know this. If this isn’t obvious, why then are medicines trialed against saline placebos if it isn’t necessary to establish a safety profile? Could it be because vaccine manufacturers are not liable for damages caused by their vaccines but are liable if their medicines cause harm?”

Thank you greatly for sharing this important, most important and most valuable medical information, for “Morons”’like me!

I say that honestly too. Because I am no expert whatsoever, I am not a scientist or doctor, I am a simple Grandfather struggling with my Grandson taking, “NOT ONE MORE SHOT!”

None, done, finished!

The problem is mandated shots now somewhere in the vicinity of 77 shots by 18 years old? AYKM?

It’s no wonder our kids are so sick, loaded with layers upon layers of emotional issues to downright autistic!

The Pharma Industry coupled with the three letter government agencies have been deliberately ignoring, misleading, flat out LYING ABOUT everything!

I thank you in advance for sharing this vital information.

May God Bless America and The Entire World!

AJR

Expand full comment
202 more comments...

No posts