This is a very serious documentary, and I would rank the implications of this on par with Covid-19 and 9/11
relevant links related to this topic:
https://www.burzynskimovie.com/ (links to subsequent 2021 interviews were removed form youtube, but you can find them on rumble if you search for each separately)
https://ericmerola.com/ (I haven't viewed any of his other documentaries, but the youtube film from above is linked from his compilation page under Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business)
Heads up...your article omitted any reference to cardiovascular drugs. ChatGPT told me: "global‐market estimate: the global cardiovascular drugs market is estimated at about US $153.7 billion in 2024 and projected to reach about US $157.8 billion in 2025."
I read recently that many trillions have been spent on cancer research in the past 50 years or so. I haven't verified this, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least. Given such a vast amount of resources, one would expect much better outcomes.
A couple of observations:
1. If true, it seems likely that the genetic theory is wrong. However, reversing course could take decades or longer.
2. The obscene profits from oncology drugs definitely lead in the opposite direction from motivation to find actual cures. Improvements perhaps, but definitely not cures.
An US east coast senior cancer research at a prestigious institute did an interview on a visit to her home country outside of the US. She said that billions of $ were spent on cancer research, and she concluded that it was a waste due limited progress versus amount spent. She added that the research was really to satisfy the egos of the researchers.
We live under an economic system based on the making of profits ("capitalism"). Under such a system, anything that seriously threatens the making of profits by powerful corporations and individuals is going to be perceived as a grave threat, and they'll take strong measures to bury it.
I'm fully aware that other hierarchical systems (such as totalitarianism) are just as destructive to human life and freedom as capitalism is. But there are other options. Maybe some day we could live as equals in a system based on the sharing of resources and cooperation. It's been done successfully many times in the past, though the powerful don't want us to know about the history of those societies. So that history is part of what they quickly bury, along with cures for cancer and clean machines.
Keeping zero point energy and cancer cures a secret keeps the money rolling in. And of course making money is more important than helping people. But I do believe the apocalypse , the unveiling, will occur.
No...what you are missing are the reasons for cancer. Mostly they are toxic poison related. That is what tumors do...try and isolate the toxins. They are NOT the cancer .
Tumors are trying to isolate the toxins, interesting idea. In 2014 I was diagnosed with cancer of uterus. I was in extreme abdominal pain. I went to the hospital and a scan was done and it was discovered that my uterus had a balloon full of fluid in it. They went in and popped the balloon and all this puss came pouring out. The fluid sent to the lab and told I had a very small speck of cancer in uterine wall. My body, in it's wisdom, had formed a blister around it to contain it. (This was not what doctors told me. this was my interpretation) I was operated on, uterus removed. The hospital tried to encourage me to get chemo and radiation where uterus used to be but I refused. I relate this because maybe the tumor is trying to isolate the "cancer", much like the blister did in my case.
Your comments on 9/11 & zero point energy are spot on, but well before 9/11 there was the Manhattan Project, which was enormous in size yet largely unknown to the general public--until it was impossible to conceal. Looking forward to your review.
There exists a small number of case studies indicating Antiparasitics including Ivermectin et al that have had remarkable therapeutic value in both impeding cancer progression of various forms, significantly reducing tumour size, even entirely eliminating them and associated plasma borne onco-indicators .
Beyond the published case studies there exists a vast landscape of individuals, reporting anecdotally, phenomenal results using these drugs off label with utterly astonishing results.
If memory serves, you have indicated that sufficient anecdotal reportage may constitute adequate indication to require further investigation.
You raise very important questions. Certainly Big Pharma which profits immensely from blockbuster traditional cancer treatments doesn't want to lose this cash cow. Please check out Harvey Bialy's book "Oncogenes, Aneuploidy and AIDS: A Scientific Life and Times of Peter H. Duesberg". Prof. Duesberg is a brilliant and highly principled virologist who gained notoriety for exposing the HIV fraud. He went on to pursue cancer research as best he could (after being blacklisted from NIH grants) in his native Germany.
Like nearly everything in our world/society nothing is what it seems and certainly not what we've been told....the biggest takeaway here is the money.....following money is always a good place to start...Then we can ask the question of why oncology drug profits have doubled since 2021.....
Cancer isn't a disease. Tumors are your body trying to protect you from excess toxins. Most people have no idea how many toxins they expose themselves to every day. Soap, deodorant, shampoo, anything you put on your skin. Stop poisoning yourself and you need not worry about cancer.
Thirty five years ago MS magazine talked this way about breast cancer. Nothing changed. A good friend died recently of breast cancer, but had it on and off for 33 years. She was younger than me, and I take no pharma drugs at all. Now my brother has died from GBM (brain cancer) and many of the people I know have a direct link with either cancer or a close family member having it. We are exposed to multiple assaults on a daily basis, from food and environment. And, by the way, scalar was something I thought would take off...hushed instead. I am pretty sure everyone now questions 9/11. I remember discussing some health problem with her (she's an MD) and her final word was, 'the government would never do that.' The more things change, the more they remain the same.
I highly recommend viewing the documentaries on Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski - original one here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ro8C75XykLo
This is a very serious documentary, and I would rank the implications of this on par with Covid-19 and 9/11
relevant links related to this topic:
https://www.burzynskimovie.com/ (links to subsequent 2021 interviews were removed form youtube, but you can find them on rumble if you search for each separately)
https://ericmerola.com/ (I haven't viewed any of his other documentaries, but the youtube film from above is linked from his compilation page under Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business)
https://www.burzynskiclinic.com/
Heads up...your article omitted any reference to cardiovascular drugs. ChatGPT told me: "global‐market estimate: the global cardiovascular drugs market is estimated at about US $153.7 billion in 2024 and projected to reach about US $157.8 billion in 2025."
I read recently that many trillions have been spent on cancer research in the past 50 years or so. I haven't verified this, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least. Given such a vast amount of resources, one would expect much better outcomes.
A couple of observations:
1. If true, it seems likely that the genetic theory is wrong. However, reversing course could take decades or longer.
2. The obscene profits from oncology drugs definitely lead in the opposite direction from motivation to find actual cures. Improvements perhaps, but definitely not cures.
An US east coast senior cancer research at a prestigious institute did an interview on a visit to her home country outside of the US. She said that billions of $ were spent on cancer research, and she concluded that it was a waste due limited progress versus amount spent. She added that the research was really to satisfy the egos of the researchers.
I have an old German Article on my substack you might be interested in. You can use google translate.
Cancer — The theory of damaged cell respiration
It's vom 1960 https://drbine.substack.com/p/der-krebs-die-theorie-der-geschadigten
Another article vom 1967 might also be interesting
The cancer problem as a selection problem
https://drbine.substack.com/p/das-krebsproblem-als-selektionsproblem
Bot mention Methylene Blue as anti cancer agent.
We live under an economic system based on the making of profits ("capitalism"). Under such a system, anything that seriously threatens the making of profits by powerful corporations and individuals is going to be perceived as a grave threat, and they'll take strong measures to bury it.
I'm fully aware that other hierarchical systems (such as totalitarianism) are just as destructive to human life and freedom as capitalism is. But there are other options. Maybe some day we could live as equals in a system based on the sharing of resources and cooperation. It's been done successfully many times in the past, though the powerful don't want us to know about the history of those societies. So that history is part of what they quickly bury, along with cures for cancer and clean machines.
Keeping zero point energy and cancer cures a secret keeps the money rolling in. And of course making money is more important than helping people. But I do believe the apocalypse , the unveiling, will occur.
No...what you are missing are the reasons for cancer. Mostly they are toxic poison related. That is what tumors do...try and isolate the toxins. They are NOT the cancer .
Tumors are trying to isolate the toxins, interesting idea. In 2014 I was diagnosed with cancer of uterus. I was in extreme abdominal pain. I went to the hospital and a scan was done and it was discovered that my uterus had a balloon full of fluid in it. They went in and popped the balloon and all this puss came pouring out. The fluid sent to the lab and told I had a very small speck of cancer in uterine wall. My body, in it's wisdom, had formed a blister around it to contain it. (This was not what doctors told me. this was my interpretation) I was operated on, uterus removed. The hospital tried to encourage me to get chemo and radiation where uterus used to be but I refused. I relate this because maybe the tumor is trying to isolate the "cancer", much like the blister did in my case.
Your comments on 9/11 & zero point energy are spot on, but well before 9/11 there was the Manhattan Project, which was enormous in size yet largely unknown to the general public--until it was impossible to conceal. Looking forward to your review.
There exists a small number of case studies indicating Antiparasitics including Ivermectin et al that have had remarkable therapeutic value in both impeding cancer progression of various forms, significantly reducing tumour size, even entirely eliminating them and associated plasma borne onco-indicators .
Beyond the published case studies there exists a vast landscape of individuals, reporting anecdotally, phenomenal results using these drugs off label with utterly astonishing results.
If memory serves, you have indicated that sufficient anecdotal reportage may constitute adequate indication to require further investigation.
Intuitively, the time for this is now.
You raise very important questions. Certainly Big Pharma which profits immensely from blockbuster traditional cancer treatments doesn't want to lose this cash cow. Please check out Harvey Bialy's book "Oncogenes, Aneuploidy and AIDS: A Scientific Life and Times of Peter H. Duesberg". Prof. Duesberg is a brilliant and highly principled virologist who gained notoriety for exposing the HIV fraud. He went on to pursue cancer research as best he could (after being blacklisted from NIH grants) in his native Germany.
Like nearly everything in our world/society nothing is what it seems and certainly not what we've been told....the biggest takeaway here is the money.....following money is always a good place to start...Then we can ask the question of why oncology drug profits have doubled since 2021.....
Cancer isn't a disease. Tumors are your body trying to protect you from excess toxins. Most people have no idea how many toxins they expose themselves to every day. Soap, deodorant, shampoo, anything you put on your skin. Stop poisoning yourself and you need not worry about cancer.
Food and environmental toxins as well cause many cancer tumors. Not all tumors are cancer, and vice versa.
As a child of much misfortune, I was taught that God will judge the Inhabitants of this World. I was terrified for myself.
Now I am an old man watching the Light of Intelligence drain from this World.
I am terrified for the Inhabitants of this World.
Thirty five years ago MS magazine talked this way about breast cancer. Nothing changed. A good friend died recently of breast cancer, but had it on and off for 33 years. She was younger than me, and I take no pharma drugs at all. Now my brother has died from GBM (brain cancer) and many of the people I know have a direct link with either cancer or a close family member having it. We are exposed to multiple assaults on a daily basis, from food and environment. And, by the way, scalar was something I thought would take off...hushed instead. I am pretty sure everyone now questions 9/11. I remember discussing some health problem with her (she's an MD) and her final word was, 'the government would never do that.' The more things change, the more they remain the same.
Interesting. Ty.