I was at a very well-attended talk by David Ray Griffin in late 2002 maybe early 2003, in Vermont, when he was on tour for his book ‘A New Pearl Harbor.’ His case was so solid against the NIST-government narrative I could not have imagined that 22 years later a significant percentage of the US population would steadfastly refuse to acknowledge evidence that that narrative is, and always has been, false. Your post is well presented and I have an urge to share it with a few people who are steadfast in their faith in ‘the experts’ the New York Times about 9/11 and the WTC collapses. Our friendship collapsed itself after the C-19 years, so it’s probably better to resist the urge.
Wonderful! I never met DRG. I am very late to the game.
I do think we need to engage with the skeptics whenever possible. In general I try to write in a tone which is provocative but not off-putting in the hope that it reaches the other side.
when i learned the DRG wrote a book about it, i had to read it. that changed my life for a decade or more. he was well known as one of the most rigorous intellectuals in the world, a philosopher of science, author of over thirty books on theology, philosophy, science and religion. he devoted the rest of his illustrious career to 9/11, writing twelve books i think. in europe where i now live far more people are cognizant of 9/11 being an inside job. that hypnotic trance of american exceptionalism has to be pierced before you can see the obvious that this government and media apparatus is thoroughly corrupt. more people are aware than we typically think. evil like this has become normalized.
Dear John: Thanks for your worthwhile comment. I especially appreciate your telling us that you "have an urge" to share this post with certain ex-friends of yours and your concluding, however, that "it's probably better to resist the urge." I relate to your feelings! In my case, the "asleep" and in-denial people who have removed themselves to the farthest periphery of my life would -- I'm pretty sure -- interpret my sharing this post with them as nothing but an ignominious attempt to hurt their feelings. From my perspective, that's a stunning state of mind -- even weird! But I have regretfully concluded that although I cannot understand the mindset, I have no choice but to acknowledge that it is real. I pray for these people and trust God to do His utmost to look out for them. Best wishes, P.A.
Seeing the collapse of WTC7 is like footage of someone being shot. It seems self evident. How could someone see anything different? Your detailed examination of NIST & Hulsey’s adds layers of irrefutability. It’s a great piece to offer those willing to look at 9/11. It’s obvious irrefutability further clarifies there are extra evidentiary elements that keep people from seeing.
I've said this before and will say it again. I was in a room full of Engineers and Architects when we saw the second tower fall on top of itself. Other than the sheer astonishment of what we had just seen, there was a 'look' on everyone's face that they couldn't believe what they were seeing.....a 110-story building falling in its own footprint. I knew then that something was terribly wrong with this picture on that day and have been investigating ever since. The other scene that overwhelmed me was seeing supposedly a jet airliner, at flying speed, fly into the first floor of the Pentagon......impossible! I worked with a team of Architects at the Pentagon for an entire Summer verifying existing conditions on the entire 3rd floor, in preparation for renovation planning and documentation. I know the site contexts very well and the surrounding area. It is impossible for a jet to come in at flying speed (approximately 180 mph), level off and strike the Pentagon's first floor like they portrayed, not with all of the other buildings around and the limited amount of level area around the Pentagon. You notice they only show a split second of the 'airliner' hitting the building. There were plenty of other CCTV cameras filming the event on one of the most protected buildings in the world and all we were allowed to see was one split second. Hmmm
Yes. Sadly though we are in the difficult position where suspicions are not enough to override the blind faith people have in authority. Even more sadly is that we have the difficult task of convincing those people they are wrong.
I find it fascinating that there are so many people with strong backgrounds in the physical sciences that will abandon what they have learned when they have to choose between basic principles and trust in authority.
In any case, the Building 7 explanation was proven false by the institution who offered the explanation. If we can't see that we are truly living in Orwellian times.
So your theory is that DEWs were used? That's possible. I have no problem holding that in consideration as more information comes to light.
I don't understand why you are so critical of those hold a controlled demolition theory as the most likely explanation. They are asking for an independent reinvestigation of those events. Do you support that? If so, your efforts to discredit that hypothesis is counterproductive. If not, what is your objective exactly?
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
“Covid-19” has been a higher level of psychological warfare.
The entire narrative is built on the foundation of belief in viral pathogens. “Belief”, because as mind-fucking as it is to investigate, if anyone reading this can provide proof of virus’ existence, you will be the first.
Unquestioning belief in authority is the collective human organism’s defense against psychological obliteration.
Some things, like best evidence of 9/11/01 and “Covid-19” are so existentially shattering that they’re impossible to perceive, much less understand. The collective mind will fight, and commit endless atrocities in order to maintain the “sanity” they have been programmed into since birth.
Those who pierce the veil must be “insane”.
What individual qualities make it inevitable for some to, no matter how disturbing, peer behind the curtain?
Not a rhetorical question. I sincerely want to read your thoughts on this.
I was at a very well-attended talk by David Ray Griffin in late 2002 maybe early 2003, in Vermont, when he was on tour for his book ‘A New Pearl Harbor.’ His case was so solid against the NIST-government narrative I could not have imagined that 22 years later a significant percentage of the US population would steadfastly refuse to acknowledge evidence that that narrative is, and always has been, false. Your post is well presented and I have an urge to share it with a few people who are steadfast in their faith in ‘the experts’ the New York Times about 9/11 and the WTC collapses. Our friendship collapsed itself after the C-19 years, so it’s probably better to resist the urge.
Wonderful! I never met DRG. I am very late to the game.
I do think we need to engage with the skeptics whenever possible. In general I try to write in a tone which is provocative but not off-putting in the hope that it reaches the other side.
when i learned the DRG wrote a book about it, i had to read it. that changed my life for a decade or more. he was well known as one of the most rigorous intellectuals in the world, a philosopher of science, author of over thirty books on theology, philosophy, science and religion. he devoted the rest of his illustrious career to 9/11, writing twelve books i think. in europe where i now live far more people are cognizant of 9/11 being an inside job. that hypnotic trance of american exceptionalism has to be pierced before you can see the obvious that this government and media apparatus is thoroughly corrupt. more people are aware than we typically think. evil like this has become normalized.
Dear John: Thanks for your worthwhile comment. I especially appreciate your telling us that you "have an urge" to share this post with certain ex-friends of yours and your concluding, however, that "it's probably better to resist the urge." I relate to your feelings! In my case, the "asleep" and in-denial people who have removed themselves to the farthest periphery of my life would -- I'm pretty sure -- interpret my sharing this post with them as nothing but an ignominious attempt to hurt their feelings. From my perspective, that's a stunning state of mind -- even weird! But I have regretfully concluded that although I cannot understand the mindset, I have no choice but to acknowledge that it is real. I pray for these people and trust God to do His utmost to look out for them. Best wishes, P.A.
Seeing the collapse of WTC7 is like footage of someone being shot. It seems self evident. How could someone see anything different? Your detailed examination of NIST & Hulsey’s adds layers of irrefutability. It’s a great piece to offer those willing to look at 9/11. It’s obvious irrefutability further clarifies there are extra evidentiary elements that keep people from seeing.
I've said this before and will say it again. I was in a room full of Engineers and Architects when we saw the second tower fall on top of itself. Other than the sheer astonishment of what we had just seen, there was a 'look' on everyone's face that they couldn't believe what they were seeing.....a 110-story building falling in its own footprint. I knew then that something was terribly wrong with this picture on that day and have been investigating ever since. The other scene that overwhelmed me was seeing supposedly a jet airliner, at flying speed, fly into the first floor of the Pentagon......impossible! I worked with a team of Architects at the Pentagon for an entire Summer verifying existing conditions on the entire 3rd floor, in preparation for renovation planning and documentation. I know the site contexts very well and the surrounding area. It is impossible for a jet to come in at flying speed (approximately 180 mph), level off and strike the Pentagon's first floor like they portrayed, not with all of the other buildings around and the limited amount of level area around the Pentagon. You notice they only show a split second of the 'airliner' hitting the building. There were plenty of other CCTV cameras filming the event on one of the most protected buildings in the world and all we were allowed to see was one split second. Hmmm
Very convincing. Everyone has seen controlled demolition. Please look into the owners communications leading up to 9/11. Very suspicious.
Yes. Sadly though we are in the difficult position where suspicions are not enough to override the blind faith people have in authority. Even more sadly is that we have the difficult task of convincing those people they are wrong.
I find it fascinating that there are so many people with strong backgrounds in the physical sciences that will abandon what they have learned when they have to choose between basic principles and trust in authority.
In any case, the Building 7 explanation was proven false by the institution who offered the explanation. If we can't see that we are truly living in Orwellian times.
“Pull it.”
As I recall, GW Bush’s cousin was in charge of security for the WTC.
Ted Walter and the disingenuous search for 9/11 Justice.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-disingenuous-search-for-911-justice
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
So your theory is that DEWs were used? That's possible. I have no problem holding that in consideration as more information comes to light.
I don't understand why you are so critical of those hold a controlled demolition theory as the most likely explanation. They are asking for an independent reinvestigation of those events. Do you support that? If so, your efforts to discredit that hypothesis is counterproductive. If not, what is your objective exactly?
Watch this documentary: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 – Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 – Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
You have aligned yourself with an organisation that is run by COINTELPRO agents.
The 9/11 Building 7 HOAX
Making fun of the proponents of conventional controlled demolition since 2011
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-building-7-hoax-video-of-2011
“Covid-19” has been a higher level of psychological warfare.
The entire narrative is built on the foundation of belief in viral pathogens. “Belief”, because as mind-fucking as it is to investigate, if anyone reading this can provide proof of virus’ existence, you will be the first.
Unquestioning belief in authority is the collective human organism’s defense against psychological obliteration.
Some things, like best evidence of 9/11/01 and “Covid-19” are so existentially shattering that they’re impossible to perceive, much less understand. The collective mind will fight, and commit endless atrocities in order to maintain the “sanity” they have been programmed into since birth.
Those who pierce the veil must be “insane”.
What individual qualities make it inevitable for some to, no matter how disturbing, peer behind the curtain?
Not a rhetorical question. I sincerely want to read your thoughts on this.