A closer look at the Pfizer/BioNTech SARS-COV2 vaccine trial raises questions about what investigators and the FDA knew and didn't know about the product's efficacy from the start
There is just a dark evil criminal theatre, nothing was or is about the safety, efficacy, benefit of a "vaccine" or about public health. We learned that in 3 years very well. There is no vaccine, all are toxic products called "countermeasures" in the contracts that nobody knows what's in them (some are still trying to find out), we know just they can kill and harm people . Why they would need a honest normal trial for that? The future is already designed for people to be permanently injected in order to travel, or to do other activities (as it was not long ago with work, school, public places) things which will come back soon.
"Trusted global digital health networks as part of efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics”...."digital health credentials technology and proof of vaccination tell you something? Well, that's what they have for us.
Is there another way to look at this? I'm not saying it's the best way. It's extremely speculative. Even so, consider:
What if all the trial subjects, vaxxed and unvaxxed, who presented with Covid-like symptoms but weren't found to be Covid-positive indeed weren't Covid positive? What if they all were infected by pathogens for which the investigators never tested. Whatever the pathogens were, these people still experienced mild to moderate illness like that experienced by the truly Covid infected. So, across the entire trial population, any salutary effect of the vaccine was way lower than advertised, as the vaccine wasn't directed against the pathogens that were causing most of the illness.
There is just a dark evil criminal theatre, nothing was or is about the safety, efficacy, benefit of a "vaccine" or about public health. We learned that in 3 years very well. There is no vaccine, all are toxic products called "countermeasures" in the contracts that nobody knows what's in them (some are still trying to find out), we know just they can kill and harm people . Why they would need a honest normal trial for that? The future is already designed for people to be permanently injected in order to travel, or to do other activities (as it was not long ago with work, school, public places) things which will come back soon.
"Trusted global digital health networks as part of efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics”...."digital health credentials technology and proof of vaccination tell you something? Well, that's what they have for us.
Is there another way to look at this? I'm not saying it's the best way. It's extremely speculative. Even so, consider:
What if all the trial subjects, vaxxed and unvaxxed, who presented with Covid-like symptoms but weren't found to be Covid-positive indeed weren't Covid positive? What if they all were infected by pathogens for which the investigators never tested. Whatever the pathogens were, these people still experienced mild to moderate illness like that experienced by the truly Covid infected. So, across the entire trial population, any salutary effect of the vaccine was way lower than advertised, as the vaccine wasn't directed against the pathogens that were causing most of the illness.