Great article, Dr. Betty. One has to wonder if these "vaccines" were specifically designed to break down the immune system. Nearly everyone I know who has been injected multiple times has struggled with a chronic cough, cold, repeated covid infections, etc. This is not even to mention the sudden deaths and turbo cancers. I think by now most people have a seemingly healthy friend or relative who has mysteriously died in the past two years. The local obituaries are chalk full of people dying in their prime. Excess death percentages are between 12-18 percent (or higher) in most vaccinated countries. With all federal agencies continuing to ignore this data and continually pushing the injections on pregnant women and children, I can only conclude that this was intentionally planned. I'm not sure how someone could logically come to any other conclusion. By the way, I feel sorry for people who follow "Your Local Epidemiologist" and hang on her every word. I wonder how much money she is making as a result of leading people astray?
It’s clear that these things are useless and very dangerous for some people. It’s not surprising given how little testing was done. Intention is much harder to prove. Making dispositive claims about it usually backfires.
From my experience with those in the industry they genuinely think they have done something wonderful for humanity.
Those with real malevolent intent are relatively few.
Intentionality may be hard to prove but it's not hard to see. DNA plasmids, SV40, endotoxin, frame shifting with pseudouridine all with known systemic distribution via highly inflammatory lipid nanoparticles.
I'm sorry. I meant to say, Dr. Setty. I need to take the stupid autocorrect off my phone. I sincerest apologies and thank you for your hard work and amazing courage.
Thank you for continuing to research the Covid vaccine
It feels like the mainstream has moved away from taking "boosters" and everyone is trying to forget what happened. This story must be kept in the public eye.
Indeed. Rehashing what exactly transpired isn't of interest, especially to those who would have to consider the fact that they may have made a mistake.
The left can never ever tolerate truth and facts. You experience just proved it once again. They live in their insulated bubbles spouting lies to each other and they either censor opposing viewpoints or purposely look the other way while their citizens die. Either way it’s time to clean house.
Saw this preprint 1/12/24 that the CDC funded for WHO showing 1.5 million lives saved in the 2.5 years of Covid-19 vaccination of December 2020 through March 2023 in 34 European nations. They used the VE "from the literature" as their main function to determine "effectiveness" to get their estimate. This is how science is done at the CDC these days. This is the second study they've contracted like this. The first was rammed through in the fall of 2021 when they lost the transmission narrative. They got plenty of cheap headlines then that at least the vaccines prevent hospitalization and death and saves lives.
"Methods We estimated the number of lives directly saved by age-group, vaccine dose and circulating Variant of Concern (VOC) period, both regionally and nationally, using weekly data on COVID-19 mortality and COVID-19 vaccine uptake reported by 34 CAT, and vaccine effectiveness (VE) data from the literature. We calculated the percentage reduction in the number of expected and reported deaths."
It’s my hope that material like this will find its way to the eyes of someone who is ready to look at things differently. Eventually the real kooks will be revealed
It feels like we are going to and fro this issues. The big question is did Vaccine help when we all most needed it ir not?
Also if you know of any early career researcher such as Post-Docs, PhDs, and Students(current and aspiring PhD and Masters students) please send them to subscribe to my newsletter as I have a lot for them in their career moves: https://gradinterface.substack.com/
"this is bordering on ridiculous–people who chose to not get jabbed don’t bunker down at home in fear of being unprotected"
It wasn't not fear of being unprotected, but I know few unvaccinated who became more sociable at the time. Many oscillated between taking their own life, leaving the country or just sitting still to watch more fear porn about Klaus Schwab, nanobots and chemtrails. Dark, dark days days.
I would consider editing that sentence.
"Moreover, the authors arbitrarily chose to exclude vaccinated people from their analysis if they contracted Covid within 28 days after getting jabbed. This resulted in the exclusion of 60 thousand from a cohort of 360 thousand. Why didn’t the authors study how those people fared with regard to long Covid as a matter of transparency and scientific rigor? We are left to guess whether this would have changed their findings with regard to the primary endpoint. "
I can explain. There is disease enhancement in people who become infected withina few days of dose 1. This uis the big one that the public is yet to acknowledge.
When this comes out, it'll be the end for these substances' approval, due to the effect this had on transmission dynamics.
Agreed. This kind of arbitrary exclusion should have been flagged in editorial review. The authors are free to set their parameters however by not including any analysis of those they excluded their methodology is indefensible. ADE is very real.
.
For Doctors Of Medicine:
This Is Not A Crisis Of Identity;
This Is Not A Crisis Of Competence
( ... There Is Too Little To Matter) ;
This Is A Crisis Of Conscience.
.
Great article, Dr. Betty. One has to wonder if these "vaccines" were specifically designed to break down the immune system. Nearly everyone I know who has been injected multiple times has struggled with a chronic cough, cold, repeated covid infections, etc. This is not even to mention the sudden deaths and turbo cancers. I think by now most people have a seemingly healthy friend or relative who has mysteriously died in the past two years. The local obituaries are chalk full of people dying in their prime. Excess death percentages are between 12-18 percent (or higher) in most vaccinated countries. With all federal agencies continuing to ignore this data and continually pushing the injections on pregnant women and children, I can only conclude that this was intentionally planned. I'm not sure how someone could logically come to any other conclusion. By the way, I feel sorry for people who follow "Your Local Epidemiologist" and hang on her every word. I wonder how much money she is making as a result of leading people astray?
It’s clear that these things are useless and very dangerous for some people. It’s not surprising given how little testing was done. Intention is much harder to prove. Making dispositive claims about it usually backfires.
From my experience with those in the industry they genuinely think they have done something wonderful for humanity.
Those with real malevolent intent are relatively few.
I think YLE is doing pretty well for herself.
Intentionality may be hard to prove but it's not hard to see. DNA plasmids, SV40, endotoxin, frame shifting with pseudouridine all with known systemic distribution via highly inflammatory lipid nanoparticles.
The STEMS forgot how to STEM?
The Juice of Rat was thoroughly tested many years before Covid was released.
And it is doing exactly what it was purposed to do - damage the immune systems of the recipients.
To prep them for the pathogen that will be released that will exploit this damage - and kill them
I'm sorry. I meant to say, Dr. Setty. I need to take the stupid autocorrect off my phone. I sincerest apologies and thank you for your hard work and amazing courage.
I agree that the excess deaths are very troubling. It is equally as troubling that there is not enough focus on why it is happening.
Centre for Depopulation Control.
Excellent article
Thank you for continuing to research the Covid vaccine
It feels like the mainstream has moved away from taking "boosters" and everyone is trying to forget what happened. This story must be kept in the public eye.
Indeed. Rehashing what exactly transpired isn't of interest, especially to those who would have to consider the fact that they may have made a mistake.
The left can never ever tolerate truth and facts. You experience just proved it once again. They live in their insulated bubbles spouting lies to each other and they either censor opposing viewpoints or purposely look the other way while their citizens die. Either way it’s time to clean house.
I think there are people on all sides that cannot tolerate facts that run counter to notions which they grasp to.
With regard to the executive director of the UKHSA, I wouldn’t place her on the right or left. She’s on top. At least for the moment
Yes the left and the right are in on this one and about all of them. Left right paradigm someone needs to look that up reality speaks.
Saw this preprint 1/12/24 that the CDC funded for WHO showing 1.5 million lives saved in the 2.5 years of Covid-19 vaccination of December 2020 through March 2023 in 34 European nations. They used the VE "from the literature" as their main function to determine "effectiveness" to get their estimate. This is how science is done at the CDC these days. This is the second study they've contracted like this. The first was rammed through in the fall of 2021 when they lost the transmission narrative. They got plenty of cheap headlines then that at least the vaccines prevent hospitalization and death and saves lives.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.12.24301206v1
"Methods We estimated the number of lives directly saved by age-group, vaccine dose and circulating Variant of Concern (VOC) period, both regionally and nationally, using weekly data on COVID-19 mortality and COVID-19 vaccine uptake reported by 34 CAT, and vaccine effectiveness (VE) data from the literature. We calculated the percentage reduction in the number of expected and reported deaths."
Exactly. Estimations like this are based in faulty "facts". The VE is highly debatable, especially after a few weeks.
How do we avoid being labeled as kooks in light of these people?
It’s my hope that material like this will find its way to the eyes of someone who is ready to look at things differently. Eventually the real kooks will be revealed
Patience is a virtue...the tides will shift....they always do. I am grateful for your knowledge and your perseverance Madhava....you are a good man
It feels like we are going to and fro this issues. The big question is did Vaccine help when we all most needed it ir not?
Also if you know of any early career researcher such as Post-Docs, PhDs, and Students(current and aspiring PhD and Masters students) please send them to subscribe to my newsletter as I have a lot for them in their career moves: https://gradinterface.substack.com/
"this is bordering on ridiculous–people who chose to not get jabbed don’t bunker down at home in fear of being unprotected"
It wasn't not fear of being unprotected, but I know few unvaccinated who became more sociable at the time. Many oscillated between taking their own life, leaving the country or just sitting still to watch more fear porn about Klaus Schwab, nanobots and chemtrails. Dark, dark days days.
I would consider editing that sentence.
"Moreover, the authors arbitrarily chose to exclude vaccinated people from their analysis if they contracted Covid within 28 days after getting jabbed. This resulted in the exclusion of 60 thousand from a cohort of 360 thousand. Why didn’t the authors study how those people fared with regard to long Covid as a matter of transparency and scientific rigor? We are left to guess whether this would have changed their findings with regard to the primary endpoint. "
I can explain. There is disease enhancement in people who become infected withina few days of dose 1. This uis the big one that the public is yet to acknowledge.
When this comes out, it'll be the end for these substances' approval, due to the effect this had on transmission dynamics.
Agreed. This kind of arbitrary exclusion should have been flagged in editorial review. The authors are free to set their parameters however by not including any analysis of those they excluded their methodology is indefensible. ADE is very real.
you back writing! thanks