25 Comments
User's avatar
Dee's avatar

They admit they put adjuvants of aluminum and mercury (thimerosal) in childhood shots. Aluminum and thimerosal are NEUROtoxins. NEUROtoxins can cause brain damage. I don't get how this isn't obvious to the zillions of people.

Expand full comment
RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

They can $ee no evil when the root of all evil blind$ them

Expand full comment
Ian Sampson's avatar

Just remember how so many things are not obvious to the masses....people are easily mislead.....just ask Cass Sunstein...lol

Expand full comment
Vinu Arumugham #MAHA's avatar

Based on evidence I provided, ChatGPT admits milk protein contaminated vaccines can cause autism. ChatGPT asserts there is no real science to vaccines.

My full conversation with ChatGPT. (20 min. read):

https://chatgpt.com/share/68071b0c-68f8-800d-8323-10476232dfe0#:~:text=Kattan

Expand full comment
James Hill, MD's avatar

Good job.

Expand full comment
T'ree's avatar

You rock.

Expand full comment
M. Stankovich, MD, MSW's avatar

"Evidence?" Right, from the dope who doesn't even understand how chatGPT works! NOTHING is retained after 2023 so when I type in your same ridiculous question, this is what you get:

"GPT-4 Turbo - OpenAI

The theory that milk protein-contaminated vaccines could cause autism is not supported by mainstream scientific research. The hypothesis around vaccines contributing to autism primarily focuses on the debunked theory linking the MMR vaccine (measles, mumps, and rubella) and autism, which has been extensively investigated and refuted by numerous studies. Concerns about milk proteins or other components in vaccines leading to autism do not have a substantial scientific foundation either.

While it’s true that some children may have allergies to certain components found in vaccines, such as gelatin or egg protein, and while contamination or impurities can occur in the manufacturing process, there is no reputable evidence to support the connection between these issues and the development of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Vaccines are highly regulated for safety, and any component, including trace elements from milk proteins if ever present, would be rigorously assessed during the safety testing phase.

For children with a genetic predisposition or particular immune system characteristics, the broader conversation about vaccine reactions is important. However, attributing these factors as a cause of autism is not accurate based on the current scientific understanding.

As always, if parents have specific concerns about allergies or immune system reactions related to vaccines, these should be discussed with a qualified healthcare provider who can provide guidance based on the latest evidence and the individual medical history of the child.."

What a difference a day makes...

Expand full comment
The Underdog's avatar

Daily reminder Copeland has what some people dubbed on Twitter as a 'cardboard PhD' (with a masters in US military propaganda). He's an in-house propagandist, first and foremost:

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/exposed-us-military-fuel-vaccine

In terms of the 'MMR shot does not cause autism', The Daily Beagle actually wrote an in-depth rebuttal to a website known as 'Rootclaim' (who claimed, based on dubious evidence, that vaccines don't cause autism). I believe one of the very flawed studies that propagandist Copeland quotes is refuted in the Daily Beagle article (and even if it wasn't; the narrative gets torn to shreds):

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/a-rebuttal-to-rootclaim

It is amusing that Copeland, who goes around raging against the "antivax" for 'grift' is now grifting full time on Spotify and is doing a full time grifting podcast. Rotten apple does not fall far from the rotten government tree.

Expand full comment
Madhava Setty, MD's avatar

Great research Underdog. I jumped on to one of Ian's community conversations on X over a year ago. I asked him about very simple things about the Pfizer shot based on their trial on adults. He didn't know how to calculate the NNV and went so far as to say that that metric was not verifiable if the authors never mentioned it. There's no way he has a real graduate education. I think he also has a pack of attack dogs that are instructed to endlessly deride any response critical of his.

I'm aggravated that I have been educated at institutions that have no issue giving their stamps of approval to posers and bad actors. From BCM (Copeland and Hotez) to UPENN (Offit). What a run.

Expand full comment
T'ree's avatar

I'm sure the pack of attack dogs is invisible bot /algorithm based.

You know the institutions are whores - not to insult whores or anything.

Expand full comment
Tricheco's avatar

Thanks for the reminder! As I recall, he was a notorious twitter troll, back when I was still reading that site; an expert at wasting people's time.

Expand full comment
Sam May's avatar

Thank you, Madhava

Here's the nugget of Eisenstein... MAHA, RFKJr, we must be wrong from the societal viewpoint "because if they (we) are right then the whole edifice of modern society — its systems of knowledge production, its public institutions, academia, government, and the ideology of progress - must be unsound." The "ideology of progress" is under attack. The whole system is under attack. Bobby is our Paul Revere. One if by the Democratic nomination, two if by riding shotgun with MAGA. They didn't see it coming! We can now see the whites of their eyes! On the autism side, they are truly scared because we are taking away their belief structure that says it must be genetic. If we succeed in introducing complex environmental systems perspectives, epigenetics pushes DNA uber alles aside. That has tremendous implications for their funding pipelines - the ideology of progress which says everything has a simple basis in genetics. This is really scary for them. It is threatening. They should be scared. We may fail at taking down that edifice, although it seems we are making real progress there.

And they have to shame us for "shaming" them. This is the woke "ableism" empathy slippering slope. Your world is so ugly and hopeless and devolved that you have to display pride in being dis-eased. Can we not have respect and love and consideration for human beings who have gotten short ends of the sticks and simultaneously work to redress causes?

These are incredibly exciting times. We are making some "progress" in countering the "ideology of progress". We are making some progress in putting on the table for review and comment a notion that maybe environmental factors are setting up problems that can be solved. Problems that may not be strickly genetic derived in a simple manner. RFKJr and MAHA are revolutionaries.

Expand full comment
T'ree's avatar

That nugget nails it.

& that is exactly why I personally did all I could to get Kennedy in this awful position.

But a lot of the "resistance' is fake in that only a relative few feed so greedily at the trough. Most just adhere to class-ist indoctrination and mass emotional manipulation.

Yet of course the few are backed by unlimited resources of the nearly un-limited supra-national Powers-that-Wanna enslave us all.

Expand full comment
Unapologetically Me's avatar

Extraordinary interview with Sasha Latypova & Katherine Watt.

Whodunnit: The Prep Act.

Please do whatever you can to spread the truth of the matter far and wide.

Kennedy is an ATTORNEY.

He wrote a book about ANTHONY FAUCI.

Nicole Shanahan is also an ATTORNEY with a vaccine injured child who miscarried her 2nd child on the campaign trail with Kennedy. (After having taken the Covid shots...)

Why don't these people KNOW??

Anyway: If you don't already know, prepare to become educated... These 2 women are highly intelligent and well informed, and they break the data down in easily understandable terms.

They've done years of due diligence and I unequivocally recommend giving this a listen. (And pay it forward, far and wide, as the entire PLANET was subjected to this montrous evil...)

https://youtu.be/V7DpYJ99Wnk

Expand full comment
Bonnie Potter's avatar

Thanks for this excellent article. Such insightful observations.

Expand full comment
coords1306's avatar

I'm in it on this one. Have family that has two high-functioning, great kids, on the spectrum, and they are taking it personally and have bought in that RFK Jr is stigmatizing them and paving the way for eugenics. I've kept my opinions to myself, but bit on it yesterday, and I don't think I did any good. It's like you say, it's too big. If you're only looking at one piece of it, there is no way RFK Jr could be right. It would mean all the Doctors and hospitals and public health officials have got this one thing wrong. And then you zoom out and everything reinforces it.

It's not just Autism after all. ADHD, Asthma, Digestion Issues, severe life-threatening allergies. And as for those health authorities, would such a mistake really stand out, or fit right in with those that were overprescribing opioids but a minute ago?, Are probably over-prescribing anti-depressants and SSRIs as we speak.

I wonder at times if that mental split between allergy and immune response wasn't purposely reinforced to spread out the growing problem of immune dysfunction by splitting it into two buckets. If all the allergy issues and auto-immune issues were in the same bucket, next to a program that tweaks our immune system relentlessly for the first few years of our lives....what's the mystery here?

It's too big. You start putting the words down and its too much. Been reading Harry Potter and when they go to recruit the Giants the joke is you can't hit them with too much at once because they'll kill you just to simplify the situation. Don't we all. Isn't that what drives relative dismissiveness? Keep praying, everyone.

Expand full comment
Jo in veritatis inquisitione's avatar

Good points

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

As long as the vaccine makers can exercise editorial control of “news” outlets with their inane, superfluous ads, it will be hard to convince those who wish not to be convinced. Not to mention the likes of Elizabeth Warren.

Expand full comment
Madhava Setty, MD's avatar

True. But so many are easily influenced. Clarity will arise by attrition of the hypnotized. Believing what is popular is probably the strongest bias in the weak minded. It's just a matter of time.

Expand full comment
T'ree's avatar

Amen

A-shay

And so it is...

Expand full comment
Unknown_Artist_'s avatar

Mrs. H, whom you can find here:

https://autnaughtaut.substack.com/p/big-phautism-fauxtism

has an interesting perspective on this thing we call "autism." My understanding of her position is essentially that vaccine brain injury was deliberately conflated with what was originally called autism, but they are and remain essentially two different things. Her investigations have unearthed a number of interesting historical details which are well worth reading about at her substack.

Expand full comment
Michelle.'s avatar

Messaging has always been Trumps Achilles heel and it continues to be a problem. A friend of mine who is a Trump supporter was complaining on facebook about RFKs comments. She has an autistic kid and was very offended. I believe he is pretty high functioning.

Expand full comment
Sun's avatar

Charles Kuralt "On the Road" to Amish communities throughout USA "in search of autism"....we need someone to do this and create a weekly documentary TV show of this....the world would tune in...at least, I would.... ...Ian's got no questions...just fully adopts one study POV...6th grade level man....hope no ones tax dollars funded Ian's education....might not be getting their money's worth....Kennedy should put out his hypothesis now - you know "science" - and start the argument now...why wait? from what action would kids benefit most? Does Ian care about kids? Hmmm

Expand full comment
T'ree's avatar

SIMPLE: Once legitimate scientific inquiry is concluded, the public can simply add aluminum doses (or whatever is most influential) to their bodies to ensure autistic-inducing effects.

Same as the petroleum based food dyes approach.

Freedom & liberty to poison yourself for each and every American !

But with no requirement or um-avoidability - so chemical/drug producers keep their market "share".

Frankly, I think this (the criticisms/blow-up) is most likely an invisitble social-media-computer-coding Social Engineering algorithm-like fabricated creation . Where constructed comments, constructed tallies of views/likes, and computer bots posing as Americans are all used to manipulate the "display" of where the manipulators want the masses to think/believe and behave/emote.

Expand full comment