These were not mistakes. This technology was given an unconditional green light from the highest levels.
If "mistakes were made", how did Moderna receive a contract on Jan 13, 2020, to produce an experimental "vaccine" designed over the weekend?
Why did SPARS and Event 201 dwell so extensively on countering "vaccine hesitancy" toward a vaccine that did not exist, for a disease class which had never been successfully vaccinated against?
The only mistakes here were made by the trusting public, who believed that their government would respond sensibly.
Interesting you brought up moderna. Right now all the negative news is strictly Pfizer with presence of sv40 & that they injected the population with an adulterated product.
Yet moderna did everything right?!
Apparently we’re supposed to be so distracted & excited that Pfizer may suffer & become extinct that we will not question moderna’s product.
Looks like a controlled demolition of Pfizer to take up all the bad consequences - injuries/deaths etc and then “they” can still hold up the MRNA platform as a viable vaccine product for humans & animals.
Re "Looks like a controlled demolition of Pfizer to take up all the bad consequences..."
That is a good point.
No company has ever done anything right with any vaccines ever since they were invented. Poisons are not good for human health but for some strange reason people seem to think injecting them into their bodies is a Good Thing.
Big pharma think it a Good Thing as they make money out of it.
Had to listen twice to grasp all the statistical points and it's still fairly technical for me, but there's plenty enough here that should have given any researcher or scientist pause to green light Pfizer's protocol. Thank you again for your work, Madhava.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
Thanks for diving into the details and confounding elements in the Pfizer trial. Your piece came at a good time--I’m half way through “Turtles All The Way Down”. Those authors cite Twain, ‘There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned, lies, and statistics.” It’s naive to think studies are driven by pure science-but easy to lean towards gullibility as we are fed this truism so often. Studies are driven by profit margins. Much as cigarette manufacturers published studies saying smoking doesn’t cause cancer, pharmaceutical companies fund studies to tout their product and hide risks. To come up with the desired results, a lot of sausage making takes place. Given this backdrop It’s not surprising things don’t add up in the Pfizer trials. Placebos seem to be causing a cluster of Serious Adverse Events, etc. I really appreciate you digging in to the smoke, mirrors and muck as the intended deception becomes more apparent with each look. People are showing a growing distrust of Covid vaccines. Hallelujah. Thanks for your work.
The odd thing is, we know now that all vaccines are never trialled with a saline placebo, they use the previous version of the vaccine as the 'placebo' control. This has been documented in the book 'Turtles all the way down'. If this is standard practice, the use of a saline in this case would seem odd. Elsewhere I have heard that the placebo used in these Pfizer trials was actually the Moderna product. From the data, that would make sense.
The substack platform does the billing, not me. The icon in the upper left has a menu where you can choose to "manage subscription". From there you can cancel your membership. FYI you do not have to pay to subscribe.
As I explained above, I do not bill you, the substack platform manages subscriptions and billing. Did you follow the instructions to unsubscribe which I posted above last month?
Very important to include; Pfizer and the regulatory authorities knew that the Lipid Nano Particle delivery technique had a known uncontrolled systemic biodistribution in Pfizer's trials
This is super CRITICAL as it was KNOWN by Pfizer and the regulatory bodies authorizing the product
that the Synthetic mRNA vaccine was not a targeted delivery point in the deltoid (where injected).
It was known the LNP would penetrate into almost every vital cell type and there on top of the inflammatory reactions of the LNP's themselves, Synthetic Genetic mRNA instructions of unnaturally long duration (unknown duration) would elicit the production of a known pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ; allowing the strong possibility to all manner of body wide autoimmune and vasculitis type conditions.
Following post delves into just how reckless the Novel Technology mRNA platform was upon its launch and panning out today
Many thanks for your post. Re "What possible excuse would an agency of public health have for hiding data from the public?"
The truth is that the world has been subject to a huge vaccine trial. The supposed pre-vaccine roll out trials are meaningless. The masses of the nations are the guinea pigs. The trial is not yet over so that is one reason for concealing data to make sure the trial continues without bias.
The wise will avoid poisonous vaccines like the plague, the unwise will continue along the broad path to destruction. My latest post for you or anyone else interested.
…Three years later the results of the Pfizer trial are still hard to explain…
Quite the opposite, I guess. These researchers have been working on this product for over twenty years. You may safely assume that they know everything about it, and more. Anyway, more and more insights like this article are surfacing. Reasonable and sound as they are, all they appear to me to be a huge waste of time, effort and energy. Why? For two reasons. One, all these articles, presentations, powerpoints and conferences are based on random, anecdotal data drawn a) from what is voluntarily being presented to the public, b) in a way that was chosen to be the angle of perception of these data sets. We have no baseline, true reference data. Disputes are being conducted even as regards the classification of the product, what to say about its mechanisms of action or complex impact on a complex universe of the human body.
All official talking points used so far have been challenged on various grounds. The announced ultra-precise post-marketing analyses and reporting have been proven to be random, incomplete, fragmentary or openly wrong. Despite all this, the product is clouded in secrecy, fenced against FOIAs, source (?) documents are being redacted, and not a single official response to findings from all over the world has happened.
Two, the answers to all these investigatory articles and research are ready and waiting out there, in the archives of the manufacturer(s). Considering the severity of the painted crisis, an expectation would be reasonable and justified that they will upload all key documents to an open-source repository for anyone to see PLUS they will publish their own approach, discussion of their methods, analyses of anything that is relevant to the product, and so on. 7 billion people were supposedly exposed to mortal risk. For anyone with common sense activated, outsourcing the savior mode to one privately-owned small group of fallible experimenters, without any public oversight, is pure madness.
In this context, whatever is being done to expose the nuances of this product is sheer waste of time and energy of a large group of brilliant minds. No doubt, they could work for the advancement of the humanity in a much more efficient way. Why don’t we go straight to the manufacturer and call them to sit at an open table to work out these things jointly with third-party scientists and journalists to really save the humanity? Who knows, it might be the easiest (only?) way to restore confidence in the medical profession.
These were not mistakes. This technology was given an unconditional green light from the highest levels.
If "mistakes were made", how did Moderna receive a contract on Jan 13, 2020, to produce an experimental "vaccine" designed over the weekend?
Why did SPARS and Event 201 dwell so extensively on countering "vaccine hesitancy" toward a vaccine that did not exist, for a disease class which had never been successfully vaccinated against?
The only mistakes here were made by the trusting public, who believed that their government would respond sensibly.
Indeed the trusting public believed that vaccines were a saviour, in fact that all vaccines have been a saviour of health.
But this was always folly as vaccines contain poisons/foreign bodies and it has never been a good idea to poison oneself in the name of good health.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/why-vaccines-do-not-work-in-a-nutshell
No disease has ever been successfully vaccinated against but big pharma love to advertise that they have as otherwise its business model will fail.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
Interesting you brought up moderna. Right now all the negative news is strictly Pfizer with presence of sv40 & that they injected the population with an adulterated product.
Yet moderna did everything right?!
Apparently we’re supposed to be so distracted & excited that Pfizer may suffer & become extinct that we will not question moderna’s product.
Looks like a controlled demolition of Pfizer to take up all the bad consequences - injuries/deaths etc and then “they” can still hold up the MRNA platform as a viable vaccine product for humans & animals.
Re "Looks like a controlled demolition of Pfizer to take up all the bad consequences..."
That is a good point.
No company has ever done anything right with any vaccines ever since they were invented. Poisons are not good for human health but for some strange reason people seem to think injecting them into their bodies is a Good Thing.
Big pharma think it a Good Thing as they make money out of it.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/why-vaccines-do-not-work-in-a-nutshell
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
Had to listen twice to grasp all the statistical points and it's still fairly technical for me, but there's plenty enough here that should have given any researcher or scientist pause to green light Pfizer's protocol. Thank you again for your work, Madhava.
Not sure why my comment posted three times but I deleted the duplicates. Sorry.
Is the Modena vaccine getting the same scrutiny?
Should be
Please keep writing about this. To heck with pharma and the disregulated regulatory agencies. Your lay audience needs and appreciates you.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars
Thanks for diving into the details and confounding elements in the Pfizer trial. Your piece came at a good time--I’m half way through “Turtles All The Way Down”. Those authors cite Twain, ‘There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned, lies, and statistics.” It’s naive to think studies are driven by pure science-but easy to lean towards gullibility as we are fed this truism so often. Studies are driven by profit margins. Much as cigarette manufacturers published studies saying smoking doesn’t cause cancer, pharmaceutical companies fund studies to tout their product and hide risks. To come up with the desired results, a lot of sausage making takes place. Given this backdrop It’s not surprising things don’t add up in the Pfizer trials. Placebos seem to be causing a cluster of Serious Adverse Events, etc. I really appreciate you digging in to the smoke, mirrors and muck as the intended deception becomes more apparent with each look. People are showing a growing distrust of Covid vaccines. Hallelujah. Thanks for your work.
Hallelujah indeed. I hope they have a complete distrust of all vaccines as poisoning oneself has never been sensible.
"Uh a malpractice" is an anagram of 'pharmaceutical' which is a big clue to the nature of the business.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2023/03/04/pharmaceuticals-whats-in-them/
The odd thing is, we know now that all vaccines are never trialled with a saline placebo, they use the previous version of the vaccine as the 'placebo' control. This has been documented in the book 'Turtles all the way down'. If this is standard practice, the use of a saline in this case would seem odd. Elsewhere I have heard that the placebo used in these Pfizer trials was actually the Moderna product. From the data, that would make sense.
Turtles is a great book but it was written prior to the pandemic. Pfizer explicitly stated that the placebo was saline. Likely the first time ever.
Brilliant so much technical info and its the same debilitating emotional heaviness.... the Pharmaceuticalcartelism is just evil pure and simple
Dear M Setty ... please can you cease the billing from my card...
I don't like this platform and I don't wish to subscribe using it.
I do not know how else to terminate the billing to your substackb. F Khan cambridge UK.
The substack platform does the billing, not me. The icon in the upper left has a menu where you can choose to "manage subscription". From there you can cancel your membership. FYI you do not have to pay to subscribe.
I am getting billed 5dollars a month...that's no fair
As I explained above, I do not bill you, the substack platform manages subscriptions and billing. Did you follow the instructions to unsubscribe which I posted above last month?
easy. cult behavior which validates the reported simpson meeting and corruption.
anybody who still hand waves is a clueless fellow, frankly.
Very important to include; Pfizer and the regulatory authorities knew that the Lipid Nano Particle delivery technique had a known uncontrolled systemic biodistribution in Pfizer's trials
see page 45 of Pfizers report
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf
This is super CRITICAL as it was KNOWN by Pfizer and the regulatory bodies authorizing the product
that the Synthetic mRNA vaccine was not a targeted delivery point in the deltoid (where injected).
It was known the LNP would penetrate into almost every vital cell type and there on top of the inflammatory reactions of the LNP's themselves, Synthetic Genetic mRNA instructions of unnaturally long duration (unknown duration) would elicit the production of a known pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ; allowing the strong possibility to all manner of body wide autoimmune and vasculitis type conditions.
Following post delves into just how reckless the Novel Technology mRNA platform was upon its launch and panning out today
https://thenobodywhoknowseverybody.substack.com/p/isnt-it-frightening-dr-robert-malone
Many thanks for your post. Re "What possible excuse would an agency of public health have for hiding data from the public?"
The truth is that the world has been subject to a huge vaccine trial. The supposed pre-vaccine roll out trials are meaningless. The masses of the nations are the guinea pigs. The trial is not yet over so that is one reason for concealing data to make sure the trial continues without bias.
The wise will avoid poisonous vaccines like the plague, the unwise will continue along the broad path to destruction. My latest post for you or anyone else interested.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/happy-birthdays-to-them-people-born
There is a YouTube video link shared by Roc Finlay in the comments which makes it very clear it was all a gigantic trial.
…Three years later the results of the Pfizer trial are still hard to explain…
Quite the opposite, I guess. These researchers have been working on this product for over twenty years. You may safely assume that they know everything about it, and more. Anyway, more and more insights like this article are surfacing. Reasonable and sound as they are, all they appear to me to be a huge waste of time, effort and energy. Why? For two reasons. One, all these articles, presentations, powerpoints and conferences are based on random, anecdotal data drawn a) from what is voluntarily being presented to the public, b) in a way that was chosen to be the angle of perception of these data sets. We have no baseline, true reference data. Disputes are being conducted even as regards the classification of the product, what to say about its mechanisms of action or complex impact on a complex universe of the human body.
All official talking points used so far have been challenged on various grounds. The announced ultra-precise post-marketing analyses and reporting have been proven to be random, incomplete, fragmentary or openly wrong. Despite all this, the product is clouded in secrecy, fenced against FOIAs, source (?) documents are being redacted, and not a single official response to findings from all over the world has happened.
Two, the answers to all these investigatory articles and research are ready and waiting out there, in the archives of the manufacturer(s). Considering the severity of the painted crisis, an expectation would be reasonable and justified that they will upload all key documents to an open-source repository for anyone to see PLUS they will publish their own approach, discussion of their methods, analyses of anything that is relevant to the product, and so on. 7 billion people were supposedly exposed to mortal risk. For anyone with common sense activated, outsourcing the savior mode to one privately-owned small group of fallible experimenters, without any public oversight, is pure madness.
In this context, whatever is being done to expose the nuances of this product is sheer waste of time and energy of a large group of brilliant minds. No doubt, they could work for the advancement of the humanity in a much more efficient way. Why don’t we go straight to the manufacturer and call them to sit at an open table to work out these things jointly with third-party scientists and journalists to really save the humanity? Who knows, it might be the easiest (only?) way to restore confidence in the medical profession.
interesting....kill everyone in a war before anyone becomes suspicious or start talking about death stats from that country